If the idiots on our side would stop taking the moral high ground and decline jury duty every time because they rightly have a conflict of interest and doom people to leftist mobs in the form of juries, maybe we could change something.
At this point I expect white people will be excluded from all juries by default. It is routinely argued that the mere presence of a white on a trial for a black person is an act of racism and invalidates the verdict.
There's also the case of people spotting the same jurors on repeat trials in succession, which isn't even supposed to be possible. With the right people in place it must be trivially easy to get professional jurors on a trial and buy a verdict.
The courts forbid exculpatory evidence. For example if the woman bringing forward the accusation has been previously convicted for bringing false rape reports, that fact may not be presented in court.
Even certain history of the specific relationship may not be presented, depending on what state you are in.
If the accused is in a state that has Affirmative Consent Laws, AKA Yes Means Yes laws, the male will have to prove that consent was not withdrawn.
If the idiots on our side would stop taking the moral high ground and decline jury duty every time because they rightly have a conflict of interest and doom people to leftist mobs in the form of juries, maybe we could change something.
This. Keep your conflict of interest to yourself and be a juror.
I have decided if I ever get picked as juror I'd vote guilty for blacks and not guilty for whites regardless of evidences
At this point I expect white people will be excluded from all juries by default. It is routinely argued that the mere presence of a white on a trial for a black person is an act of racism and invalidates the verdict.
There's also the case of people spotting the same jurors on repeat trials in succession, which isn't even supposed to be possible. With the right people in place it must be trivially easy to get professional jurors on a trial and buy a verdict.
So you'd let rapist whites go free? Idiot.
Sure, if the victims family have problem with it, they can go ahead and kill him for all I care. I'm not there for 'justice' in the courtroom
The courts forbid exculpatory evidence. For example if the woman bringing forward the accusation has been previously convicted for bringing false rape reports, that fact may not be presented in court.
Even certain history of the specific relationship may not be presented, depending on what state you are in.
If the accused is in a state that has Affirmative Consent Laws, AKA Yes Means Yes laws, the male will have to prove that consent was not withdrawn.
[Redacted]
He probably won't though, with our current prosecutors the odds are his rule will just let an innocent man go free or convict an actual criminal.
We are easily the most self defeatist political group in all of history.