Donald Trump swept the primaries in 2016 barnstorming on illegal immigration but Republican voters are just "beginning" to think it's a problem? Are you sure you know your neighbors?
Lotta "We need real conservatives, like Mitt Romney" types out here. I doubt anyone on the normie right has any real concept of the actual level of long-term damage that the current rates of migration are. Most of those normie Republican votes were just worried about specific competition to working class jobs, and a sense of unfairness. None of them were thinking about demographics. The first time that started to even get registered with normie Republicans is when Tucker Carlson occasionally touches on it.
Ditto for trannies, the suburban Democrats in Virginia voted Youngkin because of a tranny in a bathroom but Republicans don't care?? Even without my personal experience that's obviously not the case.
You're over-estimate the effect of specific incidents. Most of the culture war stuff we harp on rarely gets the attention it should. As for the Democrats, they literally have no idea regarding anything we've ever said. Nobody I know IRL knows about the Loudon County rape case. Centrists think that "Republicans are starting a culture war issue to harass drag queens. Can you believe how dumb that is? Like we don't have other problems!" Meanwhile, Democrats actually think being gay is banned in Florida, there were no BLM riots in 2020, and the economy is actually fantastic. The veil of ignorance by the media is fucking incredible. And although they are losing power, their true influence is a scale that we simply haven't matched yet. Only Donald Trump, all by his lonesome on Twitter, ever even got close.
People believe that shit. They believe it with their heart and soul, and no amount of evidence around them will convince them otherwise. They are being predated upon by monsters and they don't know it.
The parties are largely establishment and have backed Israel consistently. The Democrat influencers and foot soldiers are golems that are turning on their masters.
Tons of foreign countries are trying to influence the US government, Israel is only one of them. Neither party is truly payrolled by Israel, just influenced by varying degrees and it is profoundly obvious that that influence has badly waned. Ben Shapiro is the best they have. From a tactical perspective, that's pretty bad.
This is an interesting claim. Where are these large populations of successfully integrated natives?
Kinda all around. Lots of them have been integrated into the US well outside of the reservation system. That's the beauty of assimilation rather than creating a socialist ethno-state. Off the top of my head, the Lumbee tribe seems to have done well as I recall.
LOL!!! I guess the Africans chopping off limbs and women's breasts are just appropriating Scotch-Irish culture as well
Those same Scotch-Irish were quite familiar with exactly those kinds of brutal tactics that they engaged in during the American Revolution, including "cutting off the breasts of a mother, carving out of a baby from the womb, and placing all 3 on a shelf. Paining in blood the words: "Thou Shalt Not Give Birth To A Rebel". That was from a British officer, recording an atrocity committed by an Royalist militia. These also happen to be the same people who, in the early 1600's, were also horrifically brutalized by English conquest with such savageries as being literally skinned at bayonet point. These were a people already well versed in violence and honor culture. Sowell goes over the social approval of the Scotch-Irish towards rather gruesome amounts of violence.
In Africa, you have different honor cultures, and different savageries. This is why when American Blacks settled Liberia, the native Liberians (who actually hadn't been significantly violent), were exposed to a brutal conquest and enslavement, with the creation of a near re-creation of a southern plantation society.
Lotta "We need real conservatives, like Mitt Romney" types out here. I doubt anyone on the normie right has any real concept of the actual level of long-term damage that the current rates of migration are.
Mitt Romney "fans" are severely outnumbered in the Republican voterbase, so you're the fish out of water, not me.
You're over-estimate the effect of specific incidents. Most of the culture war stuff we harp on rarely gets the attention it should. As for the Democrats, they literally have no idea regarding anything we've ever said. Nobody I know IRL knows about the Loudon County rape case.
Statewide in Virginia they definitely do. Anyway, I hear about trannies in schools from normie Republicans these days.
Tons of foreign countries are trying to influence the US government, Israel is only one of them. Neither party is truly payrolled by Israel, just influenced by varying degrees and it is profoundly obvious that that influence has badly waned. Ben Shapiro is the best they have. From a tactical perspective, that's pretty bad.
You're looking at Ben Shapiro and I'm looking at both parties voting in lockstep to approve every pro-Israel bill that comes up, including anti-BDS legislation. I'm also looking at Congress putting the presidents of Harvard and UPenn through a wringer and forcing their resignations for an anti-Jewish climate on campus while the anti-white campus climate has only drawn crickets for years. Many governments run influence operations - Israel's is the most successful by a huge margin.
Kinda all around. Lots of them have been integrated into the US well outside of the reservation system. That's the beauty of assimilation rather than creating a socialist ethno-state. Off the top of my head, the Lumbee tribe seems to have done well as I recall.
Maybe so. I don't know enough about non-reservation Indians to dispute that.
Those same Scotch-Irish were quite familiar with exactly those kinds of brutal tactics that they engaged in during the American Revolution, including "cutting off the breasts of a mother, carving out of a baby from the womb, and placing all 3 on a shelf. Paining in blood the words: "Thou Shalt Not Give Birth To A Rebel". That was from a British officer, recording an atrocity committed by an Royalist militia. These also happen to be the same people who, in the early 1600's, were also horrifically brutalized by English conquest with such savageries as being literally skinned at bayonet point. These were a people already well versed in violence and honor culture. Sowell goes over the social approval of the Scotch-Irish towards rather gruesome amounts of violence.
Violence as told in those stories is mostly done as part of a formalized process, as the linked example - two combatants meeting to duel in front of an audience. The spontaneity of black violence has never reflected those patterns and to suggest that freed slaves learned violent habits from the Scotch-Irish is, again, ridiculous. Is it the influence of the Scotch-Irish that causes mobs of Africans to stomp out other Africans? Or cut people's arms off for fun?
You're looking at Ben Shapiro and I'm looking at both parties voting in lockstep to approve every pro-Israel bill that comes up, including anti-BDS legislation. I'm also looking at Congress putting the presidents of Harvard and UPenn through a wringer and forcing their resignations for an anti-Jewish climate on campus while the anti-white campus climate has only drawn crickets for years. Many governments run influence operations - Israel's is the most successful by a huge margin.
"Putting through a wringer" is the best they could do. If the Israel was even half as influential as people like you think, there wouldn't have been an inquest, nor would the congressmen have been stunned by her refusal. There's a ton of pressure on Harvard to oppose calls for mass murder, including millions lost in donations. She basically kept her job for a while, and the staff still openly stand with her.
I don't deny that Israel has influence in the US government. Part of the problem is how many foreign governments have more influence in the US government than most US states, including China, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar. But Israel's best efforts are middling, and are mostly relying on Evangelical prophecy & Lockheed Martin to maintain their connections. They've got no support among young Democrats at this point.
The anti-white sentiment has been going on for a while, but they're still coming from the same people, with the same agenda, and that's why there are so many progressive jews getting surprised by it. They thought they had more influence in an ideology founded on jew hatred, and they were dead wrong. They should have noticed from the Labour Party's 'Anti-Semitism Scandal'.
The spontaneity of black violence has never reflected those patterns and to suggest that freed slaves learned violent habits from the Scotch-Irish is, again, ridiculous.
I suppose that's my fault for sending you a link in the middle, but before it starts it points out another example of a Scotch-Irishman feeling dissed and threatening to come back to his employer and killing everyone. The point is that it's an honor culture which supported and promoted violence. Many American Blacks adopted it, started to Anglicanize, and Communists came in and declared that the Anglicization of Black Culture was racist and genocidal, and then promoted Communism.
Is it the influence of the Scotch-Irish that causes mobs of Africans to stomp out other Africans? Or cut people's arms off for fun?
Obviously not, but remember that each ethnic group in Africa is going to be different (just like each Indian tribe in the US is different, and others were integrated while others were not). The Boers didn't really have that many problems with the local Africans until the fucking Zulu showed up and wouldn't stop killing literally everyone. This goes double if you have to identify which groups adopted Race Marxism, imported from Progressives, during their anti-colonial period and created the hellscape of the 2nd Congolese War.
"Putting through a wringer" is the best they could do. If the Israel was even half as influential as people like you think, there wouldn't have been an inquest, nor would the congressmen have been stunned by her refusal.
You're just babbling now. Because the Jews didn't win even harder than they did, that means their influence is middling? No.
I suppose that's my fault for sending you a link in the middle, but before it starts it points out another example of a Scotch-Irishman feeling dissed and threatening to come back to his employer and killing everyone. The point is that it's an honor culture which supported and promoted violence. Many American Blacks adopted it, started to Anglicanize, and Communists came in and declared that the Anglicization of Black Culture was racist and genocidal, and then promoted Communism.
This is just a risible idea. I'll watch the rest of the Thomas Sowell video when I have time.
Obviously not, but remember that each ethnic group in Africa is going to be different (just like each Indian tribe in the US is different, and others were integrated while others were not).
Yes, and it would be much better if Kalahari bushmen were the African group that ended up in the Americas, but we got the violent ones. Obviously.
You're just babbling now. Because the Jews didn't win even harder than they did, that means their influence is middling? No.
Israelis, not jews. And again, the claims against them present a near absolute control over all narratives on Earth. What I'm saying is that they aren't winning. The American factions are, and they are latched on.
Lotta "We need real conservatives, like Mitt Romney" types out here. I doubt anyone on the normie right has any real concept of the actual level of long-term damage that the current rates of migration are. Most of those normie Republican votes were just worried about specific competition to working class jobs, and a sense of unfairness. None of them were thinking about demographics. The first time that started to even get registered with normie Republicans is when Tucker Carlson occasionally touches on it.
You're over-estimate the effect of specific incidents. Most of the culture war stuff we harp on rarely gets the attention it should. As for the Democrats, they literally have no idea regarding anything we've ever said. Nobody I know IRL knows about the Loudon County rape case. Centrists think that "Republicans are starting a culture war issue to harass drag queens. Can you believe how dumb that is? Like we don't have other problems!" Meanwhile, Democrats actually think being gay is banned in Florida, there were no BLM riots in 2020, and the economy is actually fantastic. The veil of ignorance by the media is fucking incredible. And although they are losing power, their true influence is a scale that we simply haven't matched yet. Only Donald Trump, all by his lonesome on Twitter, ever even got close.
Here, you need to truly understand the delusion here. Welcome to CNBC: the argument of a recession is dead, and there is no evidence of a struggling economy. We are facing a booming economy and the inflation crisis has been solved. Here's Jim Cramer, explaining that figures (which are always revised down), are evidence that the economy is literally "incredible". Jobs up! Wages up! Everything's great! ... This is why I believe his sole purpose in life is to lose people's life savings.
People believe that shit. They believe it with their heart and soul, and no amount of evidence around them will convince them otherwise. They are being predated upon by monsters and they don't know it.
Tons of foreign countries are trying to influence the US government, Israel is only one of them. Neither party is truly payrolled by Israel, just influenced by varying degrees and it is profoundly obvious that that influence has badly waned. Ben Shapiro is the best they have. From a tactical perspective, that's pretty bad.
Kinda all around. Lots of them have been integrated into the US well outside of the reservation system. That's the beauty of assimilation rather than creating a socialist ethno-state. Off the top of my head, the Lumbee tribe seems to have done well as I recall.
Those same Scotch-Irish were quite familiar with exactly those kinds of brutal tactics that they engaged in during the American Revolution, including "cutting off the breasts of a mother, carving out of a baby from the womb, and placing all 3 on a shelf. Paining in blood the words: "Thou Shalt Not Give Birth To A Rebel". That was from a British officer, recording an atrocity committed by an Royalist militia. These also happen to be the same people who, in the early 1600's, were also horrifically brutalized by English conquest with such savageries as being literally skinned at bayonet point. These were a people already well versed in violence and honor culture. Sowell goes over the social approval of the Scotch-Irish towards rather gruesome amounts of violence.
In Africa, you have different honor cultures, and different savageries. This is why when American Blacks settled Liberia, the native Liberians (who actually hadn't been significantly violent), were exposed to a brutal conquest and enslavement, with the creation of a near re-creation of a southern plantation society.
Mitt Romney "fans" are severely outnumbered in the Republican voterbase, so you're the fish out of water, not me.
Statewide in Virginia they definitely do. Anyway, I hear about trannies in schools from normie Republicans these days.
You're looking at Ben Shapiro and I'm looking at both parties voting in lockstep to approve every pro-Israel bill that comes up, including anti-BDS legislation. I'm also looking at Congress putting the presidents of Harvard and UPenn through a wringer and forcing their resignations for an anti-Jewish climate on campus while the anti-white campus climate has only drawn crickets for years. Many governments run influence operations - Israel's is the most successful by a huge margin.
Maybe so. I don't know enough about non-reservation Indians to dispute that.
Violence as told in those stories is mostly done as part of a formalized process, as the linked example - two combatants meeting to duel in front of an audience. The spontaneity of black violence has never reflected those patterns and to suggest that freed slaves learned violent habits from the Scotch-Irish is, again, ridiculous. Is it the influence of the Scotch-Irish that causes mobs of Africans to stomp out other Africans? Or cut people's arms off for fun?
"Putting through a wringer" is the best they could do. If the Israel was even half as influential as people like you think, there wouldn't have been an inquest, nor would the congressmen have been stunned by her refusal. There's a ton of pressure on Harvard to oppose calls for mass murder, including millions lost in donations. She basically kept her job for a while, and the staff still openly stand with her.
I don't deny that Israel has influence in the US government. Part of the problem is how many foreign governments have more influence in the US government than most US states, including China, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar. But Israel's best efforts are middling, and are mostly relying on Evangelical prophecy & Lockheed Martin to maintain their connections. They've got no support among young Democrats at this point.
The anti-white sentiment has been going on for a while, but they're still coming from the same people, with the same agenda, and that's why there are so many progressive jews getting surprised by it. They thought they had more influence in an ideology founded on jew hatred, and they were dead wrong. They should have noticed from the Labour Party's 'Anti-Semitism Scandal'.
I suppose that's my fault for sending you a link in the middle, but before it starts it points out another example of a Scotch-Irishman feeling dissed and threatening to come back to his employer and killing everyone. The point is that it's an honor culture which supported and promoted violence. Many American Blacks adopted it, started to Anglicanize, and Communists came in and declared that the Anglicization of Black Culture was racist and genocidal, and then promoted Communism.
Obviously not, but remember that each ethnic group in Africa is going to be different (just like each Indian tribe in the US is different, and others were integrated while others were not). The Boers didn't really have that many problems with the local Africans until the fucking Zulu showed up and wouldn't stop killing literally everyone. This goes double if you have to identify which groups adopted Race Marxism, imported from Progressives, during their anti-colonial period and created the hellscape of the 2nd Congolese War.
You're just babbling now. Because the Jews didn't win even harder than they did, that means their influence is middling? No.
This is just a risible idea. I'll watch the rest of the Thomas Sowell video when I have time.
Yes, and it would be much better if Kalahari bushmen were the African group that ended up in the Americas, but we got the violent ones. Obviously.
Israelis, not jews. And again, the claims against them present a near absolute control over all narratives on Earth. What I'm saying is that they aren't winning. The American factions are, and they are latched on.