You're looking at Ben Shapiro and I'm looking at both parties voting in lockstep to approve every pro-Israel bill that comes up, including anti-BDS legislation. I'm also looking at Congress putting the presidents of Harvard and UPenn through a wringer and forcing their resignations for an anti-Jewish climate on campus while the anti-white campus climate has only drawn crickets for years. Many governments run influence operations - Israel's is the most successful by a huge margin.
"Putting through a wringer" is the best they could do. If the Israel was even half as influential as people like you think, there wouldn't have been an inquest, nor would the congressmen have been stunned by her refusal. There's a ton of pressure on Harvard to oppose calls for mass murder, including millions lost in donations. She basically kept her job for a while, and the staff still openly stand with her.
I don't deny that Israel has influence in the US government. Part of the problem is how many foreign governments have more influence in the US government than most US states, including China, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar. But Israel's best efforts are middling, and are mostly relying on Evangelical prophecy & Lockheed Martin to maintain their connections. They've got no support among young Democrats at this point.
The anti-white sentiment has been going on for a while, but they're still coming from the same people, with the same agenda, and that's why there are so many progressive jews getting surprised by it. They thought they had more influence in an ideology founded on jew hatred, and they were dead wrong. They should have noticed from the Labour Party's 'Anti-Semitism Scandal'.
The spontaneity of black violence has never reflected those patterns and to suggest that freed slaves learned violent habits from the Scotch-Irish is, again, ridiculous.
I suppose that's my fault for sending you a link in the middle, but before it starts it points out another example of a Scotch-Irishman feeling dissed and threatening to come back to his employer and killing everyone. The point is that it's an honor culture which supported and promoted violence. Many American Blacks adopted it, started to Anglicanize, and Communists came in and declared that the Anglicization of Black Culture was racist and genocidal, and then promoted Communism.
Is it the influence of the Scotch-Irish that causes mobs of Africans to stomp out other Africans? Or cut people's arms off for fun?
Obviously not, but remember that each ethnic group in Africa is going to be different (just like each Indian tribe in the US is different, and others were integrated while others were not). The Boers didn't really have that many problems with the local Africans until the fucking Zulu showed up and wouldn't stop killing literally everyone. This goes double if you have to identify which groups adopted Race Marxism, imported from Progressives, during their anti-colonial period and created the hellscape of the 2nd Congolese War.
"Putting through a wringer" is the best they could do. If the Israel was even half as influential as people like you think, there wouldn't have been an inquest, nor would the congressmen have been stunned by her refusal.
You're just babbling now. Because the Jews didn't win even harder than they did, that means their influence is middling? No.
I suppose that's my fault for sending you a link in the middle, but before it starts it points out another example of a Scotch-Irishman feeling dissed and threatening to come back to his employer and killing everyone. The point is that it's an honor culture which supported and promoted violence. Many American Blacks adopted it, started to Anglicanize, and Communists came in and declared that the Anglicization of Black Culture was racist and genocidal, and then promoted Communism.
This is just a risible idea. I'll watch the rest of the Thomas Sowell video when I have time.
Obviously not, but remember that each ethnic group in Africa is going to be different (just like each Indian tribe in the US is different, and others were integrated while others were not).
Yes, and it would be much better if Kalahari bushmen were the African group that ended up in the Americas, but we got the violent ones. Obviously.
You're just babbling now. Because the Jews didn't win even harder than they did, that means their influence is middling? No.
Israelis, not jews. And again, the claims against them present a near absolute control over all narratives on Earth. What I'm saying is that they aren't winning. The American factions are, and they are latched on.
That's a distinction without much of a difference as long as money and allegiances freely flow over the US-Israel relationship.
And again, the claims against them present a near absolute control over all narratives on Earth.
This is the kind of schizo mindset that makes people ask, "are the Jews controlling your brain as well?" It's more accurate to say the Jews have a large stake in almost every mainstream narrative in the West.
What I'm saying is that they aren't winning. The American factions are, and they are latched on.
That we can agree on, no thanks to your "nothing to see here" interference though.
"Putting through a wringer" is the best they could do. If the Israel was even half as influential as people like you think, there wouldn't have been an inquest, nor would the congressmen have been stunned by her refusal. There's a ton of pressure on Harvard to oppose calls for mass murder, including millions lost in donations. She basically kept her job for a while, and the staff still openly stand with her.
I don't deny that Israel has influence in the US government. Part of the problem is how many foreign governments have more influence in the US government than most US states, including China, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar. But Israel's best efforts are middling, and are mostly relying on Evangelical prophecy & Lockheed Martin to maintain their connections. They've got no support among young Democrats at this point.
The anti-white sentiment has been going on for a while, but they're still coming from the same people, with the same agenda, and that's why there are so many progressive jews getting surprised by it. They thought they had more influence in an ideology founded on jew hatred, and they were dead wrong. They should have noticed from the Labour Party's 'Anti-Semitism Scandal'.
I suppose that's my fault for sending you a link in the middle, but before it starts it points out another example of a Scotch-Irishman feeling dissed and threatening to come back to his employer and killing everyone. The point is that it's an honor culture which supported and promoted violence. Many American Blacks adopted it, started to Anglicanize, and Communists came in and declared that the Anglicization of Black Culture was racist and genocidal, and then promoted Communism.
Obviously not, but remember that each ethnic group in Africa is going to be different (just like each Indian tribe in the US is different, and others were integrated while others were not). The Boers didn't really have that many problems with the local Africans until the fucking Zulu showed up and wouldn't stop killing literally everyone. This goes double if you have to identify which groups adopted Race Marxism, imported from Progressives, during their anti-colonial period and created the hellscape of the 2nd Congolese War.
You're just babbling now. Because the Jews didn't win even harder than they did, that means their influence is middling? No.
This is just a risible idea. I'll watch the rest of the Thomas Sowell video when I have time.
Yes, and it would be much better if Kalahari bushmen were the African group that ended up in the Americas, but we got the violent ones. Obviously.
Israelis, not jews. And again, the claims against them present a near absolute control over all narratives on Earth. What I'm saying is that they aren't winning. The American factions are, and they are latched on.
That's a distinction without much of a difference as long as money and allegiances freely flow over the US-Israel relationship.
This is the kind of schizo mindset that makes people ask, "are the Jews controlling your brain as well?" It's more accurate to say the Jews have a large stake in almost every mainstream narrative in the West.
That we can agree on, no thanks to your "nothing to see here" interference though.