Then you work against your own beliefs, because you admitted to believing in the "Consenting Adults" line. Which was always a slogan for pulling the federal government into people's relationships by forcefully legalizing gay marriage after it was rejected by basically every state and local government.
Again, you are just piping off libertarian slogans to dodge around reality and how it works.
And thank god we had to get the Federal Government involved to threaten and force it to be legalized instead of having local and state legislation do so. That's very anti-fed of you.
Because its the Feds getting personally involved to force their beliefs upon a populace that does not wish it and had shown through multiple votes they did not.
But, as we've established, you live in utopian terms and slogans. So this won't go anywhere further.
Then you work against your own beliefs, because you admitted to believing in the "Consenting Adults" line. Which was always a slogan for pulling the federal government into people's relationships by forcefully legalizing gay marriage after it was rejected by basically every state and local government.
Again, you are just piping off libertarian slogans to dodge around reality and how it works.
redefining terms is not an argument.
Gay marriage was explicitly illegal. "Legalizing" it was simply removing that government intervention.
And thank god we had to get the Federal Government involved to threaten and force it to be legalized instead of having local and state legislation do so. That's very anti-fed of you.
I do not see how preventing something from being illegal is forcing it on someone.
Because its the Feds getting personally involved to force their beliefs upon a populace that does not wish it and had shown through multiple votes they did not.
But, as we've established, you live in utopian terms and slogans. So this won't go anywhere further.