And thank god we had to get the Federal Government involved to threaten and force it to be legalized instead of having local and state legislation do so. That's very anti-fed of you.
Because its the Feds getting personally involved to force their beliefs upon a populace that does not wish it and had shown through multiple votes they did not.
But, as we've established, you live in utopian terms and slogans. So this won't go anywhere further.
redefining terms is not an argument.
Gay marriage was explicitly illegal. "Legalizing" it was simply removing that government intervention.
And thank god we had to get the Federal Government involved to threaten and force it to be legalized instead of having local and state legislation do so. That's very anti-fed of you.
I do not see how preventing something from being illegal is forcing it on someone.
Because its the Feds getting personally involved to force their beliefs upon a populace that does not wish it and had shown through multiple votes they did not.
But, as we've established, you live in utopian terms and slogans. So this won't go anywhere further.
Lifting tyranny imposed by the state is still lifting tyranny, even if its the feds doing it. especially in this era of fake and gay elections.
Would you consider the first or second amendments to be tyrannical?