I don't remember at this point because I've seen so many of these nonsense "exonerations." But this one basically boiled down to, despite all of these MFs confessing to beating her up and implicating each other of rape ("I just beat her up, I didn't rape her, but all the other guys did! I'm a good boy!") and having dirt and semen in their pants ... but then after they did it and left her unconscious and bloody in the park, another dude (Hispanic IIRC) also raped her and admitted to it.
So because a 6th person raped her, that means that these other guys are automatically somehow not rapists. Somehow. Despite every one of them admitting to beating her and holding her down while the other guys raped her.
Dirt inside the pants vs. outside the pants isn't even remotely the same thing as "kids with dirty clothes."
And no, I'm not going to have to find that out. I don't really care to. I'm not a fucking investigator or writing some sort of academic thesis. Even without that evidence, a bunch of kids giving specific details about a crime, admitting to parts of it, and implicating each other in all of it is more than enough in my mind.
I don't remember at this point because I've seen so many of these nonsense "exonerations." But this one basically boiled down to, despite all of these MFs confessing to beating her up and implicating each other of rape ("I just beat her up, I didn't rape her, but all the other guys did! I'm a good boy!") and having dirt and semen in their pants ... but then after they did it and left her unconscious and bloody in the park, another dude (Hispanic IIRC) also raped her and admitted to it.
So because a 6th person raped her, that means that these other guys are automatically somehow not rapists. Somehow. Despite every one of them admitting to beating her and holding her down while the other guys raped her.
See clockwork orange
Actually got the book recently. Saw the movie in high school. Any major differences? I’m assuming I’ll like the book more
Haven't read the book so can't compare
Where did you see this part?
I saw the confessions, none of which match each other which is already suspicious, but where did you see that there is DNA on them?
It was probably from one of Devon's earlier videos, which can be tough to track down because he's been banned so many times.
I could be misremembering the DNA evidence, but I'm 100% sure that they were all found with dirt inside their pants.
Mmm you’re gonna have to find out where you heard the dirt one too.
Either way, kids with dirty clothes is not a smoking gun by any means.
Dirt inside the pants vs. outside the pants isn't even remotely the same thing as "kids with dirty clothes."
And no, I'm not going to have to find that out. I don't really care to. I'm not a fucking investigator or writing some sort of academic thesis. Even without that evidence, a bunch of kids giving specific details about a crime, admitting to parts of it, and implicating each other in all of it is more than enough in my mind.