Part of the reason I don’t read National Geographic or read scientific or historical essays like I once did unless they are at least 12 years old.
It is really sad honestly to see delusional people like this. If I told my family that I came from a planet in the Andromeda galaxy they would work to get me help, but seeing a penis between your legs and insisting you are a woman isn’t cause for alarm?
If you were an activist for leftism, and you wanted to create massive changes in society, which of the following strategies do you think would be most effective:
Properly identify yourself as an activist and then operate in the formal capacity of an activist at all times such that everyone can easily understand your intentions.
Seek out positions of influence and authority within established institutions and then bend them towards enforcing your ideology, always maintaining plausible deniability under your official job title so that no one can call you out for being an activist pretending at another profession.
Why would you ever choose option one? Why does anyone imagine that loads of people haven’t chosen option two?
Biologically speaking, being gay is a defect since it doesn't encourage a living organism's primary function which is survival of the species and gene diversification
Part of the reason I don’t read National Geographic or read scientific or historical essays like I once did unless they are at least 12 years old.
It is really sad honestly to see delusional people like this. If I told my family that I came from a planet in the Andromeda galaxy they would work to get me help, but seeing a penis between your legs and insisting you are a woman isn’t cause for alarm?
I like to use thought experiments.
If you were an activist for leftism, and you wanted to create massive changes in society, which of the following strategies do you think would be most effective:
Properly identify yourself as an activist and then operate in the formal capacity of an activist at all times such that everyone can easily understand your intentions.
Seek out positions of influence and authority within established institutions and then bend them towards enforcing your ideology, always maintaining plausible deniability under your official job title so that no one can call you out for being an activist pretending at another profession.
Why would you ever choose option one? Why does anyone imagine that loads of people haven’t chosen option two?
Good point
Biologically speaking, being gay is a defect since it doesn't encourage a living organism's primary function which is survival of the species and gene diversification
What about them? Want to attribute subjective morals to biology? Read some Dawkins, will you
We agree!!!! lol.