What women find attractive is predominately (but not exclusively) genetic and inherited. Looks (predominately inherited) and masculinity (personality is half inherited) That's what is not socially acceptable because they're things you're born with and can't change. And society tends to make judging others on inalienable characteristics a stigma.
You can go to the gym, wear good clothes and have a well paid career, but if she don't feel the tingles (what hoe_math on YouTube calls being the "bad boy") then all that ain't going to account for anything and you can't override attraction and genetics with external factors, "rizz" and faking it (eventually she will find out and she'll realised she's been deceived and will then envision an exit plan) despite what the PUA's, coaches and gurus claim for profit. Trying to tell men that they can override evolution and innate female attraction with gym, touching grass and therapy is like telling someone that if they don't eat or drink, they don't need to go to the toilet any more. It won't end well.
society tends to make judging others on inalienable characteristics a stigma
Only if it values the group that's being judged. That's why it's still perfectly acceptable to shit on men for things like appearance or penis size. The body positivity movement was all about trying to shame Chad (or failing that a potential pay pig) into accepting fatties, uggos, and single mommies.
The real reason it's socially unacceptable to admit that genetics are pretty much the be all end all is because it undermines their AF/BB scam. Non-Chads aren't going to bust their asses to keep a society that hates them running if their only reward is a fat single mother who makes it her mission in life to punish him for not being the Chad that feminism told her she's entitled to. Since society would rather destroy itself than allow a single woman to be even slightly inconvenienced it's selling men a false bill of goods wrt female sexual selection in an attempt to keep this sick game going.
What women find attractive is predominately (but not exclusively) genetic and inherited. Looks (predominately inherited) and masculinity (personality is half inherited) That's what is not socially acceptable because they're things you're born with and can't change. And society tends to make judging others on inalienable characteristics a stigma.
You can go to the gym, wear good clothes and have a well paid career, but if she don't feel the tingles (what hoe_math on YouTube calls being the "bad boy") then all that ain't going to account for anything and you can't override attraction and genetics with external factors, "rizz" and faking it (eventually she will find out and she'll realised she's been deceived and will then envision an exit plan) despite what the PUA's, coaches and gurus claim for profit. Trying to tell men that they can override evolution and innate female attraction with gym, touching grass and therapy is like telling someone that if they don't eat or drink, they don't need to go to the toilet any more. It won't end well.
Only if it values the group that's being judged. That's why it's still perfectly acceptable to shit on men for things like appearance or penis size. The body positivity movement was all about trying to shame Chad (or failing that a potential pay pig) into accepting fatties, uggos, and single mommies.
The real reason it's socially unacceptable to admit that genetics are pretty much the be all end all is because it undermines their AF/BB scam. Non-Chads aren't going to bust their asses to keep a society that hates them running if their only reward is a fat single mother who makes it her mission in life to punish him for not being the Chad that feminism told her she's entitled to. Since society would rather destroy itself than allow a single woman to be even slightly inconvenienced it's selling men a false bill of goods wrt female sexual selection in an attempt to keep this sick game going.