You’re basically describing anarcho-tyranny, which always results in either war or genocide. For whites, that genocide is a slow but steady “soft genocide” via mass migration, indoctrination into dysgenic ideas, and the deliberate destruction of white history and culture. If war were to break out, it would have to take the form of a defensive identity politics centered in racial solidarity and advocacy.
So those are our two choices. There’s no third outcome once anarcho-tyranny has been established. People who are willing to enforce selective justice based on immutable characteristics will not be “reasoned” out of their position.
From the perspective of the gay commies they think they are normal and we are the evil ones.
To them it is the noticing that every mass looting event and most anti-social behavior is carried out by blacks that is the wrong, not the behavior itself. Or noticing that faggots are much more likely to be pedos and to carry all sorts of diseases and generally are disgusting. Or noticing that women as a population are both physically and mentally weaker than men as a population.
The willful blindness to reality is how the gay commies signal their loyalty to the "revolution". If their wishful thinking version of reality was the correct one, where all people are born equal, then they would be right in saying it is "systemic oppression perpetuated by White male Christians" that is causing all disparities.
In actual reality people aren't born equal and that explains EVERY "disparity" among groups. That doesn't mean there aren't any competent women or civilized blacks or faggots that can control themselves. It does mean that you have to treat people you don't know based on their group characteristics until they go out of the way to prove they are better than their group averages, and doing so isn't a moral failure.
You’re basically describing anarcho-tyranny, which always results in either war or genocide. For whites, that genocide is a slow but steady “soft genocide” via mass migration, indoctrination into dysgenic ideas, and the deliberate destruction of white history and culture. If war were to break out, it would have to take the form of a defensive identity politics centered in racial solidarity and advocacy.
So those are our two choices. There’s no third outcome once anarcho-tyranny has been established. People who are willing to enforce selective justice based on immutable characteristics will not be “reasoned” out of their position.
From the perspective of the gay commies they think they are normal and we are the evil ones.
To them it is the noticing that every mass looting event and most anti-social behavior is carried out by blacks that is the wrong, not the behavior itself. Or noticing that faggots are much more likely to be pedos and to carry all sorts of diseases and generally are disgusting. Or noticing that women as a population are both physically and mentally weaker than men as a population.
The willful blindness to reality is how the gay commies signal their loyalty to the "revolution". If their wishful thinking version of reality was the correct one, where all people are born equal, then they would be right in saying it is "systemic oppression perpetuated by White male Christians" that is causing all disparities.
In actual reality people aren't born equal and that explains EVERY "disparity" among groups. That doesn't mean there aren't any competent women or civilized blacks or faggots that can control themselves. It does mean that you have to treat people you don't know based on their group characteristics until they go out of the way to prove they are better than their group averages, and doing so isn't a moral failure.
Anarcho-tyranny is already established. It's just against us.
Are there even historical examples?
Every totalitarian state ever.