Because that creates a paper trail, and the people can then point on it that they did not want it, which leads to easier forming of causis belli for normies or alt Elites since then they think it is the norm to not want it and are more willing to go along.
96,8% of Poles voted against taking in non-White immigrants.
The boycot of major opposition party resulted in a low 41% turnout.
Reasonably extrapolating without boycot, thus rising turout to 70% ( same as the election ), if every of those new votes were in favor of genocide-by-migration, there would still be a majority against it.
And I really doubt 100% of those boycoting would have voted in favor of that.
Why don’t the “elites” ask the native people to vote in a referendum on the future of their genocide or not?
(Poland was asked to vote and voted 95% against mass illegal migration)
Because that creates a paper trail, and the people can then point on it that they did not want it, which leads to easier forming of causis belli for normies or alt Elites since then they think it is the norm to not want it and are more willing to go along.
96,8% of Poles voted against taking in non-White immigrants.
The boycot of major opposition party resulted in a low 41% turnout.
Reasonably extrapolating without boycot, thus rising turout to 70% ( same as the election ), if every of those new votes were in favor of genocide-by-migration, there would still be a majority against it.
And I really doubt 100% of those boycoting would have voted in favor of that.
Thanks. So the only time the native population have been asked - result was 96.8% AGAINST current mass migration style policies.
Because the average person can clearly see how it leads to their kids being genocided.