Neither do I, but the "let's all intermarry so all of humanity will be an indistinguishable brown goo" types almost persuaded me that we should all stick to our own.
Interestingly, as Sowell points out, people mostly do stick to their own - and not even the characteristics that the very online types are obsessed with. Immigrant Italians are much more likely to marry Italians, and not just other Italians, but from the same region where they were from. I think this tends to break down as people live in their new country more generations in and their culture gets homogenized.
I get that. I’m not gonna push it or forbid it. Although since I’m average looking at best and have always had bad luck with women for the most part I’m open to any race to better my chances
And yet you still have a very good and pleasant attitude, both generally and about this matter - which is much more than I can say for a lot of people.
you have no intel on this. also, if hearing that made you just wanna stick with your own kind...
No, that has nothing to do with me specifically. But the homogenizaton of literally everything is something that I oppose. And I can't think of a worse world than where everyone is the exact same. Ironically advocated for by advocates of diversity.
again your views on mix race couple is pure ass man.
But I don't want to be one race, or one people. Ironically, I do appreciate the human diversity that exists.
Imagine Europe becoming culturally homogeneous, speaking one language, one form of globalist architecture, no distinctiveness. Is that an improvement or a deterioration?
one of these days. eventually we will hit a racial point to where someone who looks 100% white, could have a 50% chance. of producing a black child.
If it wasn't clear, I am not white (nor black). But children so little resembling their parents sounds positively dystopian to me.
It is weird. And most people who are 'against' it have pretty retarded reasons for it. I may be playing devil's advocate a bit, but I do think my arguments have some validity - even if they do not establish that it's a on balance a bad thing. E.g. is a future in 2400 where there are white people, black people, Asians, etc. not preferable over one where there's just one homogeneous goo of humanity?
Neither do I, but the "let's all intermarry so all of humanity will be an indistinguishable brown goo" types almost persuaded me that we should all stick to our own.
Interestingly, as Sowell points out, people mostly do stick to their own - and not even the characteristics that the very online types are obsessed with. Immigrant Italians are much more likely to marry Italians, and not just other Italians, but from the same region where they were from. I think this tends to break down as people live in their new country more generations in and their culture gets homogenized.
I get that. I’m not gonna push it or forbid it. Although since I’m average looking at best and have always had bad luck with women for the most part I’m open to any race to better my chances
And yet you still have a very good and pleasant attitude, both generally and about this matter - which is much more than I can say for a lot of people.
No, that has nothing to do with me specifically. But the homogenizaton of literally everything is something that I oppose. And I can't think of a worse world than where everyone is the exact same. Ironically advocated for by advocates of diversity.
I expressed no views on mixed-race couples.
But I don't want to be one race, or one people. Ironically, I do appreciate the human diversity that exists.
Imagine Europe becoming culturally homogeneous, speaking one language, one form of globalist architecture, no distinctiveness. Is that an improvement or a deterioration?
If it wasn't clear, I am not white (nor black). But children so little resembling their parents sounds positively dystopian to me.
Probably.
It is weird. And most people who are 'against' it have pretty retarded reasons for it. I may be playing devil's advocate a bit, but I do think my arguments have some validity - even if they do not establish that it's a on balance a bad thing. E.g. is a future in 2400 where there are white people, black people, Asians, etc. not preferable over one where there's just one homogeneous goo of humanity?