It is weird. And most people who are 'against' it have pretty retarded reasons for it. I may be playing devil's advocate a bit, but I do think my arguments have some validity - even if they do not establish that it's a on balance a bad thing. E.g. is a future in 2400 where there are white people, black people, Asians, etc. not preferable over one where there's just one homogeneous goo of humanity?
It is weird. And most people who are 'against' it have pretty retarded reasons for it. I may be playing devil's advocate a bit, but I do think my arguments have some validity - even if they do not establish that it's a on balance a bad thing. E.g. is a future in 2400 where there are white people, black people, Asians, etc. not preferable over one where there's just one homogeneous goo of humanity?