you have no intel on this. also, if hearing that made you just wanna stick with your own kind...
No, that has nothing to do with me specifically. But the homogenizaton of literally everything is something that I oppose. And I can't think of a worse world than where everyone is the exact same. Ironically advocated for by advocates of diversity.
again your views on mix race couple is pure ass man.
But I don't want to be one race, or one people. Ironically, I do appreciate the human diversity that exists.
Imagine Europe becoming culturally homogeneous, speaking one language, one form of globalist architecture, no distinctiveness. Is that an improvement or a deterioration?
one of these days. eventually we will hit a racial point to where someone who looks 100% white, could have a 50% chance. of producing a black child.
If it wasn't clear, I am not white (nor black). But children so little resembling their parents sounds positively dystopian to me.
It is weird. And most people who are 'against' it have pretty retarded reasons for it. I may be playing devil's advocate a bit, but I do think my arguments have some validity - even if they do not establish that it's a on balance a bad thing. E.g. is a future in 2400 where there are white people, black people, Asians, etc. not preferable over one where there's just one homogeneous goo of humanity?
No, that has nothing to do with me specifically. But the homogenizaton of literally everything is something that I oppose. And I can't think of a worse world than where everyone is the exact same. Ironically advocated for by advocates of diversity.
I expressed no views on mixed-race couples.
But I don't want to be one race, or one people. Ironically, I do appreciate the human diversity that exists.
Imagine Europe becoming culturally homogeneous, speaking one language, one form of globalist architecture, no distinctiveness. Is that an improvement or a deterioration?
If it wasn't clear, I am not white (nor black). But children so little resembling their parents sounds positively dystopian to me.
Probably.
It is weird. And most people who are 'against' it have pretty retarded reasons for it. I may be playing devil's advocate a bit, but I do think my arguments have some validity - even if they do not establish that it's a on balance a bad thing. E.g. is a future in 2400 where there are white people, black people, Asians, etc. not preferable over one where there's just one homogeneous goo of humanity?