Useless schizobabble from a literal retard. Whatever the depredations of the USSR, it was not engaged in 'genocide against white people'. However, that ironically was the plan of your hero Hitler.
USSR ... not engaged in 'genocide against white people.' However, that ironically was the plan of your hero Hitler.
As someone who has a branch of my family in Ukraine, one which didn't emigrate in 1905, I laugh in Holodomor-- the kind of death Communists have in store for all of us: death by hunger.
You don't get to dismiss with a handwave 'whatever the depredations of the USSR.' If that's the condition, the rest of that conditional statement is null and void. The depredations of the USSR have everything do do with why the Nazis attacked them.
I say this even though the Nazis wouldn't have constructed either Slav or Jew as white. They knew very well what horrors Stalin intended for the rest of Europe when they preempted his planned offensive and blew up his army.
Stopping the USSR, given the horrors of its existence, would otherwise be a moral good if not an imperative.
That you go on to imply Hitler's genocide of Schrödinger's Whites is ironic? Well, good thing I was already laughing.
As someone who has a branch of my family in Ukraine, one which didn't emigrate in 1905,
Best of luck to them, by the way.
I laugh in Holodomor-- the kind of death Communists have in store for all of us: death by hunger.
Genocide is an attempt to wipe out a specific population. If you say that the communists were 'committing genocide against white people', they were trying to wipe them out. And specifically white people.
That is stupid.
The depredations of the USSR have everything do do with why the Nazis attacked them.
The Nazi claimed that Hitler attacked the USSR 'to save white people'. That is quite possibly the most idiotic statement I've ever read.
I say this even though the Nazis wouldn't have constructed either Slav or Jew as white.
Maybe this is an America-centric way of looking at it. The Nazis did not care about white or non-white, they cared about Aryan and non-Aryan - and they didn't count Slavs as Aryan.
They knew very well what horrors Stalin intended for the rest of Europe when they preempted his planned offensive and blew up his army.
There was no 'planned offensive'. You may be the victim of propaganda. Stalin's army was woefully unprepared precisely because he wanted to avoid a conflict, and he ignored everyone telling him otherwise until the very last moment. General staffs always draw up plans for every eventuality, including wars of aggression, but there is absolutely no evidence that Stalin was planning on invading Nazi Germany - not in 1941.
That you go on to imply Hitler's genocide of Schrödinger's Whites is ironic? Well, good thing I was already laughing.
No, Hitler wanting to wipe out Slavs (who are white) is ironic.
Whatever the depredations of the USSR, it was not engaged in 'genocide against white people'.
Are you aware of what samizdat is? I suppose not.
The "depredations" of the USSR went beyond just genocide; as with all communist regimes, they sought to mentally devolve their victims into unthinking slaves through a system of absolute censorship and information control, whose end-goal was to render them unable to even put words into describing their suffering as they were exploited.
A fate worse than death.
Of course you would try and sweep it all under the rug. I am not surprised.
I know it has nothing to do with 'genocide against white people', which you apparently don't.
Of course you would try and sweep it all under the rug. I am not surprised.
The stupidity of the very online right in a nutshell. First claim that the USSR is 'committing genocide against white people', then when that's refuted, claim that pointing out that this is false is sweeping something completely unrelated under the rug.
I know it has nothing to do with 'genocide against white people', which you apparently don't.
I said it was genocide and more. Your pathetic whining and nitpicking over individual lines doesn't change the fact that the russian people are predominantly white - and they were subject to mass murder and worse under marxist rule.
You claim to say that samizdat has 'nothing to do with genocide against white people' - but that just highlights your own ignorance; that you have no idea what genocide really is when it involves mass murder AND the total erasure of a people's cultural history.
Maybe if you decided to stop parroting what you were taught by your leash-holders and do your own research, maybe you'd have a better understanding of what happened to the Russian peo-
The stupidity of the very online right in a nutshell.
Ah yes, doing ones own research is a "right wing talking point". I shouldn't expect any sensible debate coming from a your kind. After all, anyone who disagrees with your owners is 'online right' or some other buzzword created by your owners at Demcast.
First claim that the USSR is 'committing genocide against white people', then when that's refuted, claim that pointing out that this is false is sweeping something completely unrelated under the rug.
You refuted nothing. Good luck trying to erase the sheer volumes of records detailing the bolshevik regime's genocides against the Russian people, though. (Blanking wikipedia articles doesn't count)
Useless schizobabble from a literal retard. Whatever the depredations of the USSR, it was not engaged in 'genocide against white people'. However, that ironically was the plan of your hero Hitler.
As someone who has a branch of my family in Ukraine, one which didn't emigrate in 1905, I laugh in Holodomor-- the kind of death Communists have in store for all of us: death by hunger.
You don't get to dismiss with a handwave 'whatever the depredations of the USSR.' If that's the condition, the rest of that conditional statement is null and void. The depredations of the USSR have everything do do with why the Nazis attacked them.
I say this even though the Nazis wouldn't have constructed either Slav or Jew as white. They knew very well what horrors Stalin intended for the rest of Europe when they preempted his planned offensive and blew up his army.
Stopping the USSR, given the horrors of its existence, would otherwise be a moral good if not an imperative.
That you go on to imply Hitler's genocide of Schrödinger's Whites is ironic? Well, good thing I was already laughing.
Best of luck to them, by the way.
Genocide is an attempt to wipe out a specific population. If you say that the communists were 'committing genocide against white people', they were trying to wipe them out. And specifically white people.
That is stupid.
The Nazi claimed that Hitler attacked the USSR 'to save white people'. That is quite possibly the most idiotic statement I've ever read.
Maybe this is an America-centric way of looking at it. The Nazis did not care about white or non-white, they cared about Aryan and non-Aryan - and they didn't count Slavs as Aryan.
There was no 'planned offensive'. You may be the victim of propaganda. Stalin's army was woefully unprepared precisely because he wanted to avoid a conflict, and he ignored everyone telling him otherwise until the very last moment. General staffs always draw up plans for every eventuality, including wars of aggression, but there is absolutely no evidence that Stalin was planning on invading Nazi Germany - not in 1941.
No, Hitler wanting to wipe out Slavs (who are white) is ironic.
Are you aware of what samizdat is? I suppose not.
The "depredations" of the USSR went beyond just genocide; as with all communist regimes, they sought to mentally devolve their victims into unthinking slaves through a system of absolute censorship and information control, whose end-goal was to render them unable to even put words into describing their suffering as they were exploited.
A fate worse than death.
Of course you would try and sweep it all under the rug. I am not surprised.
I know it has nothing to do with 'genocide against white people', which you apparently don't.
The stupidity of the very online right in a nutshell. First claim that the USSR is 'committing genocide against white people', then when that's refuted, claim that pointing out that this is false is sweeping something completely unrelated under the rug.
I said it was genocide and more. Your pathetic whining and nitpicking over individual lines doesn't change the fact that the russian people are predominantly white - and they were subject to mass murder and worse under marxist rule.
You claim to say that samizdat has 'nothing to do with genocide against white people' - but that just highlights your own ignorance; that you have no idea what genocide really is when it involves mass murder AND the total erasure of a people's cultural history.
Maybe if you decided to stop parroting what you were taught by your leash-holders and do your own research, maybe you'd have a better understanding of what happened to the Russian peo-
Ah yes, doing ones own research is a "right wing talking point". I shouldn't expect any sensible debate coming from a your kind. After all, anyone who disagrees with your owners is 'online right' or some other buzzword created by your owners at Demcast.
You refuted nothing. Good luck trying to erase the sheer volumes of records detailing the bolshevik regime's genocides against the Russian people, though. (Blanking wikipedia articles doesn't count)
Pot calling the kettle black here.
Where did you get your history - off the back of a corn flakes box?
Which historical fact is confusing you?
While you're at it, I'd love to hear where you get your history.
David Irving
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs (x2)
You're allowed to call each other retards.
GASP. Ableist BASTARD.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 (x2)
Comment Removed for Rule 16 and possibly Rule 2 - No Sanction too old