Whatever the depredations of the USSR, it was not engaged in 'genocide against white people'.
Are you aware of what samizdat is? I suppose not.
The "depredations" of the USSR went beyond just genocide; as with all communist regimes, they sought to mentally devolve their victims into unthinking slaves through a system of absolute censorship and information control, whose end-goal was to render them unable to even put words into describing their suffering as they were exploited.
A fate worse than death.
Of course you would try and sweep it all under the rug. I am not surprised.
I know it has nothing to do with 'genocide against white people', which you apparently don't.
Of course you would try and sweep it all under the rug. I am not surprised.
The stupidity of the very online right in a nutshell. First claim that the USSR is 'committing genocide against white people', then when that's refuted, claim that pointing out that this is false is sweeping something completely unrelated under the rug.
I know it has nothing to do with 'genocide against white people', which you apparently don't.
I said it was genocide and more. Your pathetic whining and nitpicking over individual lines doesn't change the fact that the russian people are predominantly white - and they were subject to mass murder and worse under marxist rule.
You claim to say that samizdat has 'nothing to do with genocide against white people' - but that just highlights your own ignorance; that you have no idea what genocide really is when it involves mass murder AND the total erasure of a people's cultural history.
Maybe if you decided to stop parroting what you were taught by your leash-holders and do your own research, maybe you'd have a better understanding of what happened to the Russian peo-
The stupidity of the very online right in a nutshell.
Ah yes, doing ones own research is a "right wing talking point". I shouldn't expect any sensible debate coming from a your kind. After all, anyone who disagrees with your owners is 'online right' or some other buzzword created by your owners at Demcast.
First claim that the USSR is 'committing genocide against white people', then when that's refuted, claim that pointing out that this is false is sweeping something completely unrelated under the rug.
You refuted nothing. Good luck trying to erase the sheer volumes of records detailing the bolshevik regime's genocides against the Russian people, though. (Blanking wikipedia articles doesn't count)
Your pathetic whining and nitpicking over individual lines doesn't change the fact that the russian people are predominantly white - and they were subject to mass murder and worse under marxist rule.
Even an attempt to wipe out Russian people, which the Bolsheviks did not do, is not the same as 'genocide against white people'. If there is anyone who is nitpicking, it's you - too bad your nits don't even make sense. After all, you're defending a guy who's so retarded that he thinks Hitler invaded the USSR to "save white people".
You claim to say that samizdat has 'nothing to do with genocide against white people' -
Correct. You just learned a buzzword, and thought that repeating it while trying to be condescending is the same as making a point. The fact that you think that samizdat is some sort of deep, arcane point shows your level of knowledge about the USSR.
Maybe if you decided to stop parroting what you were taught by your leash-holders and do your own research
Do tell me where you did your... ahem... research. Blog posts? Online forums? A guy selling pencils from a cup?
Ah yes, doing ones own research is a "right wing talking point".
You don't do your own research, but this wasn't even about the opinions you blindly copied from other people. This was about the fact that you attempted to label pointing out facts as sweeping something completely different under the rug, which is just plain retarded.
Then again, very online right...
After all, anyone who disagrees with your owners is 'online right' or some other buzzword created by your owners at Demcast.
Your owners.
Good luck trying to erase the sheer volumes of records detailing the bolshevik regime's genocides against the Russian people, though.
Once again, it seems that you don't even know what genocide is. It's an attempt to wipe out a population in part or in whole. The Bolsheviks were not targeting the Russian people for destruction on that basis, they were targeting their political opposition.
Not every bad thing is 'genocide'. Jesus Christ man.
Even an attempt to wipe out Russian people, which the Bolsheviks did not do, is not the same as 'genocide against white people'. If there is anyone who is nitpicking, it's you - too bad your nits don't even make sense.
You truly have no idea just how ignorant you are.
The boslheviks sought to do worse than merely wiping out the Russian people. The erasure of their cultural history, and the destruction of their populations into the millions is just a small part of the genocide unleashed upon them.
After all, you're defending a guy who's so retarded that he thinks Hitler invaded the USSR to "save white people".
Nah. I'm just here to watch you simp for the bolsheviks and smile at how far you've fallen. Keep coping, though.
Correct. You just learned a buzzword, and thought that repeating it while trying to be condescending is the same as making a point.
You're just grasping at straws because you're desperately covering up why samizdat existed in the first place.
The fact that you think that samizdat is some sort of deep, arcane point shows your level of knowledge about the USSR.
Says the guy who thinks there was no genocide targeted against the russian people. Thanks again for a comprehensive display of your own ignorance.
Do tell me where you did your... ahem... research. Blog posts? Online forums? A guy selling pencils from a cup?
You whine about 'condescension', while seeking to invalidate anyone who has different opinions than you. I respond to you with this;
The six rules of debating your kind.
Don’t let them emotionally bait you. They will attack your race, intellect and humanity to try and upset you. It deteriorates from there.
See rule 1. Burn that into your brain.
Never, ever answer a question from them. Ask them one or 10 in return.
Quote them. Don’t reply via comment. (They can delete your comment from their thread but can’t delete your post quoting them)
Screenshot/archive the comment or post you’re quoting - then they can’t edit after the fact.
Keep cool. Remember they’re literally paid to derail threads and push their narratives.
You don't do your own research, but this wasn't even about the opinions you blindly copied from other people. This was about the fact that you attempted to label pointing out facts as sweeping something completely different under the rug, which is just plain retarded.
Your kind always considers opinions outside of corporate outlets approved by the State to be 'not research'. Also, did you have a stroke writing that second sentence? Stop using ChatGPT, that'll help.
Then again, very online right...
Everyone you lot don't like is a buzzword. You say that because you cannot argue against the facts I've stated.
Your owners.
A pathetic bolshevik shill like you cannot comprehend the very idea of a free peoples. So of course you assume I am owned, like you.
I am not.
Once again, it seems that you don't even know what genocide is. It's an attempt to wipe out a population in part or in whole. The Bolsheviks were not targeting the Russian people for destruction on that basis, they were targeting their political opposition.
Their "political opposition" was basically the entire population aside from the 'ruling class' - and even their elites weren't safe from being unpersoned once their 'leaders' began to wallow in paranoia. From the office worker suspected of connections to the "capitalist powers", to a farmer unable to meet state quotas, they were all deemed 'political opposition'.
Maybe if you knew ANYTHING about Russian history, you'd know that much. But nah, your kind are reduced to running PR for the state-sponsored murder of millions of people simply because your leash-holders demand it.
Not every bad thing is 'genocide'. Jesus Christ man.
Are you aware of what samizdat is? I suppose not.
The "depredations" of the USSR went beyond just genocide; as with all communist regimes, they sought to mentally devolve their victims into unthinking slaves through a system of absolute censorship and information control, whose end-goal was to render them unable to even put words into describing their suffering as they were exploited.
A fate worse than death.
Of course you would try and sweep it all under the rug. I am not surprised.
I know it has nothing to do with 'genocide against white people', which you apparently don't.
The stupidity of the very online right in a nutshell. First claim that the USSR is 'committing genocide against white people', then when that's refuted, claim that pointing out that this is false is sweeping something completely unrelated under the rug.
I said it was genocide and more. Your pathetic whining and nitpicking over individual lines doesn't change the fact that the russian people are predominantly white - and they were subject to mass murder and worse under marxist rule.
You claim to say that samizdat has 'nothing to do with genocide against white people' - but that just highlights your own ignorance; that you have no idea what genocide really is when it involves mass murder AND the total erasure of a people's cultural history.
Maybe if you decided to stop parroting what you were taught by your leash-holders and do your own research, maybe you'd have a better understanding of what happened to the Russian peo-
Ah yes, doing ones own research is a "right wing talking point". I shouldn't expect any sensible debate coming from a your kind. After all, anyone who disagrees with your owners is 'online right' or some other buzzword created by your owners at Demcast.
You refuted nothing. Good luck trying to erase the sheer volumes of records detailing the bolshevik regime's genocides against the Russian people, though. (Blanking wikipedia articles doesn't count)
Even an attempt to wipe out Russian people, which the Bolsheviks did not do, is not the same as 'genocide against white people'. If there is anyone who is nitpicking, it's you - too bad your nits don't even make sense. After all, you're defending a guy who's so retarded that he thinks Hitler invaded the USSR to "save white people".
Correct. You just learned a buzzword, and thought that repeating it while trying to be condescending is the same as making a point. The fact that you think that samizdat is some sort of deep, arcane point shows your level of knowledge about the USSR.
Do tell me where you did your... ahem... research. Blog posts? Online forums? A guy selling pencils from a cup?
You don't do your own research, but this wasn't even about the opinions you blindly copied from other people. This was about the fact that you attempted to label pointing out facts as sweeping something completely different under the rug, which is just plain retarded.
Then again, very online right...
Your owners.
Once again, it seems that you don't even know what genocide is. It's an attempt to wipe out a population in part or in whole. The Bolsheviks were not targeting the Russian people for destruction on that basis, they were targeting their political opposition.
Not every bad thing is 'genocide'. Jesus Christ man.
You truly have no idea just how ignorant you are.
The boslheviks sought to do worse than merely wiping out the Russian people. The erasure of their cultural history, and the destruction of their populations into the millions is just a small part of the genocide unleashed upon them.
Nah. I'm just here to watch you simp for the bolsheviks and smile at how far you've fallen. Keep coping, though.
You're just grasping at straws because you're desperately covering up why samizdat existed in the first place.
Says the guy who thinks there was no genocide targeted against the russian people. Thanks again for a comprehensive display of your own ignorance.
You whine about 'condescension', while seeking to invalidate anyone who has different opinions than you. I respond to you with this;
The six rules of debating your kind.
Don’t let them emotionally bait you. They will attack your race, intellect and humanity to try and upset you. It deteriorates from there.
See rule 1. Burn that into your brain.
Never, ever answer a question from them. Ask them one or 10 in return.
Quote them. Don’t reply via comment. (They can delete your comment from their thread but can’t delete your post quoting them)
Screenshot/archive the comment or post you’re quoting - then they can’t edit after the fact.
Keep cool. Remember they’re literally paid to derail threads and push their narratives.
Your kind always considers opinions outside of corporate outlets approved by the State to be 'not research'. Also, did you have a stroke writing that second sentence? Stop using ChatGPT, that'll help.
Everyone you lot don't like is a buzzword. You say that because you cannot argue against the facts I've stated.
A pathetic bolshevik shill like you cannot comprehend the very idea of a free peoples. So of course you assume I am owned, like you.
I am not.
Their "political opposition" was basically the entire population aside from the 'ruling class' - and even their elites weren't safe from being unpersoned once their 'leaders' began to wallow in paranoia. From the office worker suspected of connections to the "capitalist powers", to a farmer unable to meet state quotas, they were all deemed 'political opposition'.
Maybe if you knew ANYTHING about Russian history, you'd know that much. But nah, your kind are reduced to running PR for the state-sponsored murder of millions of people simply because your leash-holders demand it.
Remember Year Zero, commie.