there is normal and retarded with retarded being the category with a negative connotation
the reason the gay commies invented "homosexual" is to normalize sodomites
the idea was to make faggotry and normal behavior into choices with equal moral weight, using "heterosexual" instead of "normal" reinforces that premise
I wish I had a comeback to that, but you could be right. All I can say is appearance-wise, he's like an awakening boomer (well gen-x) lib. "I didn't change. You guys changed!" People like that tolerate any kind of degenerate filth or cultural subversion, but say that the left are just being the intolerant ones now. They're usually fine with "cis", as long as they aren't forced to use someone else's "pronouns." So bringing up the "cis is a slur" talking point, which I rarely hear from right-wingers except on small message boards like this, points to an awareness of current concerns I didn't expect.
That said it's not the first thing I've seen him say something that made me think "is this dude reading 4chan?"
He says so many things but does nothing. That's how you know he is a fraud. He tweeted about the plight of South African Whites. That's it, tweeted. The guy is a billionaire. He could do a "based" version of George Soros activism if he wanted to. He chooses to idly tweet instead. It's because he doesn't actually care. He's basically been groomed to take Trump's place as a public figure to keep budding dissidents "on the plantation."
Still accepts the premise that "homosexual" is a real category or people
Homosexuality is a mental defect. Your post is like saying "retard" isn't a real categorization of people.
It's a mental or a normal defect, take your pick.
there is normal and retarded with retarded being the category with a negative connotation
the reason the gay commies invented "homosexual" is to normalize sodomites
the idea was to make faggotry and normal behavior into choices with equal moral weight, using "heterosexual" instead of "normal" reinforces that premise
Baby steps. I'm surprised he accepted this much.
Why? His personality and statements are curated to appeal to you.
I wish I had a comeback to that, but you could be right. All I can say is appearance-wise, he's like an awakening boomer (well gen-x) lib. "I didn't change. You guys changed!" People like that tolerate any kind of degenerate filth or cultural subversion, but say that the left are just being the intolerant ones now. They're usually fine with "cis", as long as they aren't forced to use someone else's "pronouns." So bringing up the "cis is a slur" talking point, which I rarely hear from right-wingers except on small message boards like this, points to an awareness of current concerns I didn't expect.
That said it's not the first thing I've seen him say something that made me think "is this dude reading 4chan?"
He says so many things but does nothing. That's how you know he is a fraud. He tweeted about the plight of South African Whites. That's it, tweeted. The guy is a billionaire. He could do a "based" version of George Soros activism if he wanted to. He chooses to idly tweet instead. It's because he doesn't actually care. He's basically been groomed to take Trump's place as a public figure to keep budding dissidents "on the plantation."
👉👃(on the nose)