Perhaps I should have specified what was meant by "civil rights" because that's a huge umbrella. I only meant that every American child should be afforded the same rights.
I'm not on board with forcing businesses to hire based on race, or to force private clubs to look likes Pharma ad.
If you can't discriminate, you don't have the freedom to associate.
If you are forced to make hiring decisions based on race then you don't have property rights over your business.
Perhaps I should have specified what was meant by "civil rights" because that's a huge umbrella. I only meant that every American child should be afforded the same rights.
I'm not on board with forcing businesses to hire based on race, or to force private clubs to look likes Pharma ad.
I mean the text of the 1964 civil rights act. Every actionable provision is anti-property rights, anti-association, and anti-state sovereignty.
Even if you agree with the law on its face, it has been used to launder in the idea of "disparate impact" which is a fundamentally anti White concept.
Gotcha. No argument from me there.