It was never about "same rights". It was always about a federal power grab using contrived edge cases appealing to mostly white women as a pretext.
Is "civil rights" worth losing freedom of association? Of stealing the property rights of business owners? Of allowing the federal government to destroy what little was left of state sovereignty post civil war?
Perhaps I should have specified what was meant by "civil rights" because that's a huge umbrella. I only meant that every American child should be afforded the same rights.
I'm not on board with forcing businesses to hire based on race, or to force private clubs to look likes Pharma ad.
Pushing communism, feminism, abortion and open borders is definitely worse than believing every American should have the same rights lol
It was never about "same rights". It was always about a federal power grab using contrived edge cases appealing to mostly white women as a pretext.
Is "civil rights" worth losing freedom of association? Of stealing the property rights of business owners? Of allowing the federal government to destroy what little was left of state sovereignty post civil war?
How did civil rights lead to a loss of freedom to associate? Or stealing property rights?
If you can't discriminate, you don't have the freedom to associate.
If you are forced to make hiring decisions based on race then you don't have property rights over your business.
Perhaps I should have specified what was meant by "civil rights" because that's a huge umbrella. I only meant that every American child should be afforded the same rights.
I'm not on board with forcing businesses to hire based on race, or to force private clubs to look likes Pharma ad.