Ha
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (59)
sorted by:
As the great Patrice O'Neal once showed, that if you ask women "what can you provide your man if you didn't have a vagina" they will always default to anal, mouth, or other sex acts.
Not one considers being valuable in any other way, like joining his hobbies or providing for him in some way. They literally see their only value as being holes.
Thought experiment: The store you just entered is sold out of eggs, milk, and bread. What else should you buy there instead on your weekly shopping trip?
Oh, addendum, the store is actually a Petsmart. Didn't mention that. But the leading question made you think "grocer" automatically.
Or in other words... To be fair, that question is slanted in a way to make people think of sex acts. It's funny, and makes good youtube clickbait, but it's just a "gotcha" with poorly worded questions. "If you lost your dick, how would you satisfy your woman?", men will also answer "oral" or "fingering", not "providing a safe home and food".
Your thought experiment is phrased poorly so its "gotcha" reveal doesn't work.
Pet stores don't "sell out" of eggs, milk and bread because they don't stock them in the first place.
Your gotcha question would be technically true if it were presented as "The store you just entered doesn't have eggs, milk and bread in stock."
Which is still weasel words, but at least technically correct.
That's a fair criticism and I won't deny it is leading. But he specifically uses the word "keep" your man (which is my fault for using the wrong word myself), which has a much different connotation than "satisfy" in yours.
Since, if we are splitting hairs that much, makes a massive difference. Because "satisfy your partner" is almost only used for sexual purposes. Simply "keeping" one is neutral in that regard and should at least provide some non-sexual answers.