I wouldn't say that protecting your border is murder. But let's assume that it is. I'm merely remarking on the irony that something that is supposedly 'inhumane' would lead to the most humane outcome, namely invaders not coming and not dying in leaky vessels.
Is this meant to counterclaim that some immigrants hold weapons? If so, I still don't think we should gun them indiscriminately. I especially don't think we should call gunning them indiscriminately 'humane.'
No, Michael Brown was 'unarmed', but he was highly aggressive and dangerous. And I don't believe in 'gunning down' immigrants, indiscriminately or otherwise. I'm an immigrant myself. But I don't think invaders are the same as immigrants.
I wouldn't say that protecting your border is murder. But let's assume that it is. I'm merely remarking on the irony that something that is supposedly 'inhumane' would lead to the most humane outcome, namely invaders not coming and not dying in leaky vessels.
That wordplay, man.
There's nothing merciful or compassionate about shooting unarmed people. It is not humane.
Michael Brown would like to have a talk with you. And I think invaders fall in that same category.
I admire how you stick to moral principle, I really do. You're a Catholic, correct?
Is this meant to counterclaim that some immigrants hold weapons? If so, I still don't think we should gun them indiscriminately. I especially don't think we should call gunning them indiscriminately 'humane.'
Yes, I'm Catholic.
No, Michael Brown was 'unarmed', but he was highly aggressive and dangerous. And I don't believe in 'gunning down' immigrants, indiscriminately or otherwise. I'm an immigrant myself. But I don't think invaders are the same as immigrants.