No host population has ever given majority approval for mass immigration. Immigrants only want to to go to already prosperous nations, and prosperous populations are never served by mass immigration. It’s tautological.
That's probably one of the best single sentence summations of the issue I've heard.
I would counterpoint though on "and prosperous populations are never served by mass immigration"
The richest are served by cheap labour, and more importantly labour who's presence is based on compliance. A corrupt owner doesn't want 0 deportations, they want to be able to report uppity or non compliant workers and have them deported.
No host population has ever given majority approval for mass immigration. Immigrants only want to to go to already prosperous nations, and prosperous populations are never served by mass immigration. It’s tautological.
That's probably one of the best single sentence summations of the issue I've heard.
I would counterpoint though on "and prosperous populations are never served by mass immigration" The richest are served by cheap labour, and more importantly labour who's presence is based on compliance. A corrupt owner doesn't want 0 deportations, they want to be able to report uppity or non compliant workers and have them deported.
Or wait until payday before "remembering" they have no right to work or even be in the country.