The right image defines it as "realistic," which one could hope simply means that if they cannot tell if its an actual child or not they lean on the side of caution and absolutely destroy that shit.
Because that part has always been super illegal, and was one of the big reasons for the Supreme Court case in the 90s, wherein guys were pasting kids heads on nude bodies and other stuff were it could be CP unless you specifically knew it wasn't.
But that's probably not going to be the case, as that's far too much interest in protecting actual kids over angry feelings about drawings.
The problem is some people cannot separate "I personally find it reprehensible and will judge you on it" from "It should be illegal, banished and the full weight thrown at you for it."
Personally, I find it quite effective to simply quote actual laws at them and the history of them, which usually gets them caught in a loop of screaming "YOU ARE A PEDO FOR EVEN QUESTIONING IT! The government would NEVER abuse a law if you let them pass it!!"
People on here actively refuse to separate the two. I have flat out said I don't want it banned just acknowledged that it's pedo shit and all I'll hear back is "you're trying to censor" "so you want it banned"
Reminder that the age of consent is only 18 in a few states.
But one of those states is California. So in their bubble, they think it's everywhere.
Not that it matters. Drawings do not have human rights.
I don't like the art, but I hate censorship more.
The right image defines it as "realistic," which one could hope simply means that if they cannot tell if its an actual child or not they lean on the side of caution and absolutely destroy that shit.
Because that part has always been super illegal, and was one of the big reasons for the Supreme Court case in the 90s, wherein guys were pasting kids heads on nude bodies and other stuff were it could be CP unless you specifically knew it wasn't.
But that's probably not going to be the case, as that's far too much interest in protecting actual kids over angry feelings about drawings.
The problem is some people cannot separate "I personally find it reprehensible and will judge you on it" from "It should be illegal, banished and the full weight thrown at you for it."
Personally, I find it quite effective to simply quote actual laws at them and the history of them, which usually gets them caught in a loop of screaming "YOU ARE A PEDO FOR EVEN QUESTIONING IT! The government would NEVER abuse a law if you let them pass it!!"
People on here actively refuse to separate the two. I have flat out said I don't want it banned just acknowledged that it's pedo shit and all I'll hear back is "you're trying to censor" "so you want it banned"