The right image defines it as "realistic," which one could hope simply means that if they cannot tell if its an actual child or not they lean on the side of caution and absolutely destroy that shit.
Because that part has always been super illegal, and was one of the big reasons for the Supreme Court case in the 90s, wherein guys were pasting kids heads on nude bodies and other stuff were it could be CP unless you specifically knew it wasn't.
But that's probably not going to be the case, as that's far too much interest in protecting actual kids over angry feelings about drawings.
Reminder that the age of consent is only 18 in a few states.
But one of those states is California. So in their bubble, they think it's everywhere.
Not that it matters. Drawings do not have human rights.
I don't like the art, but I hate censorship more.
The right image defines it as "realistic," which one could hope simply means that if they cannot tell if its an actual child or not they lean on the side of caution and absolutely destroy that shit.
Because that part has always been super illegal, and was one of the big reasons for the Supreme Court case in the 90s, wherein guys were pasting kids heads on nude bodies and other stuff were it could be CP unless you specifically knew it wasn't.
But that's probably not going to be the case, as that's far too much interest in protecting actual kids over angry feelings about drawings.
But you know damn well its gonna be exploited where they report every anime character lol.
not just "no boobs" i've seen people complaining "the face looks like a child" about characters that are obviously well over the age