Look, If Brand is tried and convicted THEN you can deperson him
Has he even been accused of anything that he could be convicted of? All I've heard so far is "sexual misconduct" (aka bullshit) and "didn't use a condom in otherwise consensual sex." Oh, and one time he had a "look." Can't forget about that damning accusation.
Because of the UK's laws on sex, they might be able to convince someone that sex with deception was rape, but that definition would be retroactively applied since his sexual activity predated the new definition of rape. That being said, it's not possible to get more evidence, so that's all that there's ever going to be at this point.
They couldn't convict him even if he actually did rape someone because there's no evidence left.
I don't think it's consensual if you agree on sex with a condom and your guy then takes it off.
Now I don't got a vagina, but I'll make the assumption you can probably tell when one is on versus off as it plunges into your slophole.
Which leaves the only two options of you called him out on this, during which he continued and its just regular rape, or you didn't, meaning you let him violate your "consent" silently and I have no respect or sympathy for you.
Basically, the condom thing means nothing because its still either just fucking rape or he didn't know it was nonconsensual. Same as always.
Has he even been accused of anything that he could be convicted of? All I've heard so far is "sexual misconduct" (aka bullshit) and "didn't use a condom in otherwise consensual sex." Oh, and one time he had a "look." Can't forget about that damning accusation.
Because of the UK's laws on sex, they might be able to convince someone that sex with deception was rape, but that definition would be retroactively applied since his sexual activity predated the new definition of rape. That being said, it's not possible to get more evidence, so that's all that there's ever going to be at this point.
They couldn't convict him even if he actually did rape someone because there's no evidence left.
I think there's one or two accusations of rape in there.
As for condoms, I don't think it's consensual if you agree on sex with a condom and your guy then takes it off.
Now I don't got a vagina, but I'll make the assumption you can probably tell when one is on versus off as it plunges into your slophole.
Which leaves the only two options of you called him out on this, during which he continued and its just regular rape, or you didn't, meaning you let him violate your "consent" silently and I have no respect or sympathy for you.
Basically, the condom thing means nothing because its still either just fucking rape or he didn't know it was nonconsensual. Same as always.