Sexy cartoon women should literally be illegal
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
the precedent was already set when every single one of our governments was replaced with pedophiles who think foreskin cream keeps them young. this phenomenon is nothing but fat ugly footsoldiers getting uppity because they're mere useful idiots and not in on the actual plan - in what world, tell me, in what world is it a reasonable possibility that the powers that shouldn't be are trying to stop you from cooming to video games when they already push pornography on the exact same monitor to infinity?
Because of course, the only thing you can ever be opposing at any time is the One World Power Elite that controls anything and everything, from which everything synchronizes into mobility for its whims.
Really sounds to me like you just want to attack coomers, and are triyng to gussy it up with emotionally charged buzzwords to give yourself the appearance of a principle being stood on.
Additionally, I would argue they go after stuff like this because the modern Left attacks anything that is conventionally attractive. It is also why they get so angry at video game mods and anime, as well as any Hollywood movie that dares to step out of line.
it seems to me like you refuse to deny that this IS about cooming, but you also refuse to acknowledge that cooming is exactly what the enemies you claim want you to do in the first place. rotting your brain with pornography, especially hours and hours a day by playing videogames with pornographic elements, is a complete win for them.
through words on the internet i can do little in the face of denial, unfortunately.
I'm not going to play the game, I have no interest in it, and I find that type of heavy fanservice game slop to be tiresome. No cooming needed for me to still defend its right to exist.
ah, i see, you'd also die to the defend the right for a gay man to defend his weed farm with an ar-15, right?