The letters were not written to question the legitimacy of the judicial system, or the validity of the jury’s ruling.
And so what if they were? We have a case here where someone publicly stated that they weren't raped, accepted a cash settlement and then came back years later and said "I was raped". There was absolutely no evidence to corroborate this accusation and the defendant denied it. That alone meets the standard of reasonable doubt in the US legal system.
Then, the judge allowed the prosecution to tell the jury that he drugged women without presenting any evidence in support of it. Everything about this trial undermines the legitimacy of the United States legal system and the validity of the jury's ruling.
And so what if they were? We have a case here where someone publicly stated that they weren't raped, accepted a cash settlement and then came back years later and said "I was raped". There was absolutely no evidence to corroborate this accusation and the defendant denied it. That alone meets the standard of reasonable doubt in the US legal system.
Then, the judge allowed the prosecution to tell the jury that he drugged women without presenting any evidence in support of it. Everything about this trial undermines the legitimacy of the United States legal system and the validity of the jury's ruling.
but muh re-traumatizing :((((
I assume Masterson appeals to a higher court soon