Is the US going to try to seize the assets of a private company for 'the war effort'? Because that's the only way you can use Starlink to effectively do a drone version of Pearl Harbour on the Russians without Elon's permission.
But you even TRY to do that and it'd kill all donor support for the Democrats and even media support to. Whining about it and doing disparaging remarks is one thing. Seizing assists from billionaires tends to get you backlash quick.
But you even TRY to do that and it'd kill all donor support for the Democrats and even media support to[o].
I don't know about that. I think we're getting to a point where even "moderate" dems will at least vocally support "eating the rich," especially for the right cause.
Seizing ass[e]ts from billionaires tends to get you backlash quick.
The Russian oligarchs had power, but NOWHERE near the power and wealth of your Elon's, Bezos or Gate's.
As proven by the fact that no one who brings them up can name more than one of them if that, or even knew they were a thing until a news article told them so.
Elon said they're being paid to build a seperate version of starlink for the military. Keeping in mind this thing happened like a year ago, I think it's highly likely the US government did not want him to extend the range at the time. Apparently everyone changed their mind later but that was later.
Is the US going to try to seize the assets of a private company for 'the war effort'? Because that's the only way you can use Starlink to effectively do a drone version of Pearl Harbour on the Russians without Elon's permission.
But you even TRY to do that and it'd kill all donor support for the Democrats and even media support to. Whining about it and doing disparaging remarks is one thing. Seizing assists from billionaires tends to get you backlash quick.
I don't know about that. I think we're getting to a point where even "moderate" dems will at least vocally support "eating the rich," especially for the right cause.
Russian oligarchs say hello.
The Russian oligarchs had power, but NOWHERE near the power and wealth of your Elon's, Bezos or Gate's.
Couple that with how dependent the US is on space x for rockets and now's not a good time to fuck with them...
As proven by the fact that no one who brings them up can name more than one of them if that, or even knew they were a thing until a news article told them so.
Elon said they're being paid to build a seperate version of starlink for the military. Keeping in mind this thing happened like a year ago, I think it's highly likely the US government did not want him to extend the range at the time. Apparently everyone changed their mind later but that was later.