For example, "You are an asshole" is concise but rather broad in its possible interpretations. Some "truthful things can be stated simply and concisely," but discussions of Hitler, his public image, and refuting claims that "Hitler was just a misunderstood, ordinary guy who was forced into the stuff he did" can't.
Gizortnik is what you get, when you want to imagine arguing with Destiny in written format. The deceitful thing is that It's all that excessive points you have to address when you just want to argue a single specific point. The fact that I have to point this simple concept is how fucked up the modern debate is.
Okay, example. "Blacks commit a lot of crime" simple statement. True on it's face. Now, one can be (((deceitful))) and say
well blacks don't commit a lot of tax fraud.
Well what about whites?
Or, how black are they really? They probably have some whitening them from the days if slavery.
What do you mean by black? Are Indians black? What about this and that.
Etc etc.
But the fact is ordinary people.know the simple statement to be true. Blacks rape at higher rates than other groups. And murder. And assault. And loot. And armed robbery. And when the kayman says blacks commit a lot of crime we all know exactly what is being referred to. But a deceitful person will feign ignorance or outrage at the assertion and argue over tedious nuance.
Right.
For example, "You are an asshole" is concise but rather broad in its possible interpretations. Some "truthful things can be stated simply and concisely," but discussions of Hitler, his public image, and refuting claims that "Hitler was just a misunderstood, ordinary guy who was forced into the stuff he did" can't.
It's less about this specific instance and more about Gizortnik's pattern of excessive verbosity whenever he starts being deceitful or wrongheaded.
I genuinely don’t know what exactly is “deceitful” about what he’s saying
Gizortnik is what you get, when you want to imagine arguing with Destiny in written format. The deceitful thing is that It's all that excessive points you have to address when you just want to argue a single specific point. The fact that I have to point this simple concept is how fucked up the modern debate is.
Okay, example. "Blacks commit a lot of crime" simple statement. True on it's face. Now, one can be (((deceitful))) and say
well blacks don't commit a lot of tax fraud.
Well what about whites?
Or, how black are they really? They probably have some whitening them from the days if slavery.
What do you mean by black? Are Indians black? What about this and that.
Etc etc.
But the fact is ordinary people.know the simple statement to be true. Blacks rape at higher rates than other groups. And murder. And assault. And loot. And armed robbery. And when the kayman says blacks commit a lot of crime we all know exactly what is being referred to. But a deceitful person will feign ignorance or outrage at the assertion and argue over tedious nuance.