So im sure by now people have noticed that sjws dont care about actual pedos, they completely ignore actual pedos, but they have an irrational hatred over short fictional anime characters, to the point where they are now basically just doing the "anything short is pedo" and Amazon is completely removing the "short body type" in Blue Protocal. Yeah they just erased short characters completely.
Calling it "pedo" is just a cover for the real grievances they have, the real reason for the irrational hatred of petite female characters and anime and Japanese games in general, and it is the same reason they removed jiggle physics from the game. They think it caters to "the male fantasy". But they cant say this is the reason ,so they just say that its "pedo bait"
Yo, guys, I caught one!
Find God.
And thats the problem i see here when someone is not allowed to simply disagree without getting attacked
Its what happens when people are trying to portray an emotional stance as a moral one.
They don't have good arguments against something that stand up to even the slightest scrutiny, but it (perhaps rightfully) upsets them, so you must be evil and they fall back on self-righteous smugness as their shield.
It is a moral stance and satisfying deviant sexual urges increases those urges and makes you more likely to attempt them in real life. Just experiencing arousal from them increases the likelihood of committing sexual offenses.
If this was the truth then the infinite number of guys out there doing Light to Heavy BDSM would be going out and actually mutilating and killing women.
But let's assume you are right, how do we get rid of it? Can you name a nearly perfect set of criteria and definitions that wouldn't ban triple the amount of non-related media? Or one that wouldn't leave loopholes that make it worthless in terms of stopping actual deviants from consuming it anyway? Because the last couple of times the US Legal system tried they literally wrote it into law as "I know it when I see it!!" which I shouldn't have to explain the issue with.
That's why I call it an emotional stance. Because you are disgusted by it, for good reason, and then you work backwards from that to justify it being bad while disregarding all logic and reason. Because people know it would make them hypocrites to frame it any other way when they are committing the same logical fallacies that the woke do to try and ban stuff they are grossed out by, and then rushing to trying and censor without a care about the incidental damage.