Men vs women chores... So sexist
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
How about the fact that women aren't expected to be earning an income... A little work around the house like cooking, which a woman needs to do anyway to survive herself, is expected.
Yep. The image completely discounts careers as meaningful skills.
Aren't the skills supposed to pay the bills, ladies?
Yet ironically, women use the fact they work as the reason why they shouldn't have to do any chores; however, women rarely ever contribute monetarily to the household. Women work for themselves and expect the man to work for the household then the woman discounts the man's financial contribution to the household for any allocation of "chore" duty. It's a giant fucking scam. If the woman earns significantly more than the man she uses that as rationale for why he should do everything for her. If she earns significantly less than "amount of money earned" shouldn't be a factor on splitting chores. Lmao. Women are such scammers. The simps that fall for this shit are pathetic.
A woman who doesn't cook and clean isn't worth being in a relationship with. The end.
Let's say I have never met and certainly never been with a woman who can reasonably divide chores. Every one that I know has a huge black hole in both the knowledge and fucksgiving departments about "man things." You notice people don't argue over who replaces the floodlights way the fuck up attached to the second story.
"Knowledge" is actually a huge blackhole in how women divide out tasks. I have a relatively "easy" job in terms of "work" being done. I can do about 2 hours of actual work a day. I can come into work early and leave early. What women don't factor in is that it took years of schooling to get the job. Not only that, most people literally cannot gain the knowledge because it's too hard. I've had housewives who literally just "look after kids", "do the dishes" and "clean-up the kitchen" tell me their job is harder than mine simply because they spend more "time" doing work than I do and they put more effort into it, despite the fact they would be unable to do my job. Yet they don't factor in the work involved to gain the knowledge and expertise to do my job nor factor in the higher than average intelligence required.
This is a significant shortfall in the way women measure "work". If she spent 30 minutes folding clothes, she will consider that "more" work and "harder" work than the 20 minutes it took you to replace the floodlights even though most guys would see folding clothes as significantly easier work.
Women just don't measure "work" properly in any way at all.
Just imagine how a communist wants to allocate resources based on "work done" and that's pretty much how women see it. I think that's why women in the office try so hard to stressed out and overworked because that's the only way women understand work. The more exhausted (mentally or physically) a person is the more work he must have did, yet this is also completely false also because a 120 pound dude doing construction might do fuck all for work and be exhausted while a 200 pound guy might do 10x the work and not be exhausted at all.
No matter how you look at it. Women measure work in all regards, wrong. Generally speaking, women just give the advantage in "work" done to themselves and ignore any respect the man should deserve for the work he does.