WaPo: Muslims hate homos. Clearly, this is Drumpflemort's fault
(acecomments.mu.nu)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
What's weird is that it's only sort of. They have this super-weird double-think going on where depending on crazy circumstances, giving your friend a bro-job is totally not gay bro. However, homosexuality is somehow also obviously evil.
Man Love Thursday is very, very real.
I remember having a "Culture Expert" try to deny it and explain to our military unit that we just saw men holding hands and assumed it was a gay couple. That, however, does not explain the dudes giving head in the alleyway, giving us a thumbs up.
Also, so is, "It's not gay since you're not getting married."
I think one of the craziest things Doc ever told me about was the time he had to explain sex with women to an Afghan, who was thoroughly confused and repulsed by the idea. He thought they had penises and everything.
Muslim leadership also routinely engage in pedophilia with both boys and girls. Mostly, they're just hypocrites.
Typically girls. Weirdly, pedophilia with boys is much more frowned upon. Probably something related to Mohammed.
Officially, yes. Unofficially, Sheikhs and Emirs all over the Gulf States and beyond can get away with violating Shariah and doing whatever they want. And they do.
It's not just the top, though. Plenty of the plebs engage in the same thing.
Not really. They're okay with raping and mentally breaking boys as long as their victims belong to the races they want exterminated. The victims are usually the children of native peoples of any country they invade.
No, Islam really doesn't care about race. It cares about religion. They rape white girls because they are Christian. They rape Yasidi girls because they are (also) Christian.
You'd be hard pressed to find a human who isn't a hypocrite. However this especially runs rapid among the Western left so it isn't that surprising they suck Muslim dick.
We could do with that kind of doublethink. Let people do what they want, no harm no foul, but stop the cultural subversion in its tracks.
That's not double think, though. That's just understanding boundaries.
Yeah but it kind of has the same result, doesn't it? The leftists/global elites are always dishonestly redefining terms to get their way, so why can't we define homosexuality as the evil cultural subversion and just turn a blind eye to the sexual acts? Actually, didn't it work that way for a long time? Homosexual acts were technically illegal but the laws just weren't enforced?
Well, forget about homosexuality for a minute because that's not the issue of tactics we're talking about. You're talking about weaponizing the re-definition of terms.
You don't want to do that because you are ceding control over reality and objectivity itself. Now, the Left always wants to abandon reality and objectivity in favor of ideological pursuit, but it's not ground anyone else should give up. Once you give up on being consistent with definitions, the entire fight becomes a complete abstraction and ideological. At that point, the Left can outflank you from any position they want, arguing one hyper-reality against another.
Only sometimes. This is a major problem when it comes to the concept of the state as a moral enforcer. Infamously, Alan Turing was chemically castrated (which eventually lead to his suicide) for a consensual relationship. While it is odd for a 39 year old and a 19 year old to be in a relationship, we'd still be tolerant of a heterosexual relationship at that age, even if it was uncouth, it wouldn't be illegal, let alone justify castration. The pressure on British homosexuals was severe enough that they invented a kind of internal language.
Moralists will refuse to address the cause of the moral violations, and will instead just keep using the police to punish violators, without ever fixing the underlying social failing. If Christian moralists hadn't been relying on the state to solve all their moral problems for the past 70 years, we wouldn't be in the mess we're in now. You want to have some kind of social enforcement to keep things clean, and keep things from spiraling. This is why a local community would know who a local homosexual was, but wouldn't prosecute him, because he was one of their community members who was just needed to be taken care of (like the local hobo or hermit). I get that that is closer to what you're going for, but it doesn't work either.
Keeping gay relationships as a segregated part of society was workable, but wasn't necessarily a good idea as it drove all gays underground into a level of even more severe degeneracy than what we see. It may not be a Christian ethic, but homosexual marriage has probably done more good for gay men than anything else, providing them with something close to a healthy monogamous relationship. You don't really want to just ignore it, otherwise you get what led up to Stonewall. The gay activists don't like to talk about why there was a police crackdown on Stonewall, just that there was. Truth is, since homosexuality was illegal, the mob took advantage of the demand for a homosexual social place, and created an illegal gay bar. Already, that's supporting organized crime. Worse, because the police are being bribed not to look into it, it's spreading corruption. Then on top of that, since it's effectively lawless, bad shit's starting to happen like rapes and sexual batteries that go unreported, and the felons go unrepentant. The degeneracy actually starts to go hog wild because anonymity starts to get involved: glory holes, dark rooms (orgies where no one can see each other), and so on and so forth. Then disease starts to spread. But it keeps getting worse, and gay prostitutes start leaving the Greenwich area (because they don't want to pay off the mob) and start going into neighboring communities. Eventually, the cops end up breaking up a 40 man orgy that was taking place in a meat truck in a nearby grocery store, and the cops decide they have to stop looking the other way. Thus, there is a crackdown. In the raid, they start recording the name of everyone involved, and instead of fines like normal, they're making mass arrests. Which means everyone there is going to lose their jobs, their families, and their friends; all while the place was already effectively lawless to begin with.
It's the perfect storm to get you a riot with a kick line.
Believe or not, what we are seeing now is much the same. Pride parades are effectively lawless and having spiraling degeneracy that feeds off itself. You can't ignore it and segregate it. It has to be integrated into the society and live to specific standards. That's why gay marriage as a secular institution has some value: you don't see monogamous gay men (like Dave Rubin) get caught in a police dragnet at a meat-truck orgy.
I never said that, don't be retarded. I said the Arab world pretends not to be gay while explicitly running apologetics for it.
Islam today is dependent on it, to the point that the guys in sodom and gomorrah would go "dude what the fuck, stop assraping children, you filthy degenerate." Rape, deceit and invasion are what makes them so powerful today.