Heard this from Styx's stream earlier thought I'd share it here, for scale of this demon:
Included within the 1,623 charges are 136 counts of rape, 110 counts of sexual intercourse with a child younger than 10 — a charge used instead of rape in some Australian jurisdictions — and 613 counts of making child pornography.
Thing is the authorities got wind of him after finding a CP stash in 2014, but wasn't till August LAST YEAR did they locate him. If you're making a fucking surveillance state and its takes you around 9 fucking years to locate such a prolific pedophile then you are beyond a failure and should be replaced by anarchy than this shit.
He skipped states… To a state that doesn’t have mandatory reporting/information sharing…
So while i agree, yes, it also shows you the problem of “jurisdiction-shipping” and border hopping, when it comes to egregious shit like this…
Sounds like it happened across three states (the three biggest ones). 3! Pretty fucked, really…
But nah, the surveillance state isn’t worried about people like him.
More people like me, who actively criticize the government, refused to comply with the jaberoo shit (mostly), and who intends to vote a firm “No” in their ideological referendum…
It’s people like me who the surveillance state is watching, lol…
Unfortunately. Despite my not having committed a crime, unlike this monster…
Men like that always get away with it. At least until they don’t.
“The victims have been contacted and have been provided counseling”, the news said. Yeah, I’m sure that will make all the difference, at this point. Not…
Simply put, the state don’t care. Sorry, but that’s the truth of it…
Pretty much but using the argument against the surveillance state with cases like this is a good strategy
Normies will occasionally go 'think of the children, that's why we need the government to have more powers to monitor' and we just throw these examples in their face of how the state didn't give a fuck, they were more focused on arresting and debanking an anti lockdown protestor than a demon raping under 10 year old girls.
It's quite simple: the surveillance state is to protect them and their cronies. they don't allocate resources to catching pedophiles because pedophiles are not a threat to the state. matter of fact, pedophiles in many cases are part of the state.
Heard this from Styx's stream earlier thought I'd share it here, for scale of this demon:
Thing is the authorities got wind of him after finding a CP stash in 2014, but wasn't till August LAST YEAR did they locate him. If you're making a fucking surveillance state and its takes you around 9 fucking years to locate such a prolific pedophile then you are beyond a failure and should be replaced by anarchy than this shit.
He skipped states… To a state that doesn’t have mandatory reporting/information sharing…
So while i agree, yes, it also shows you the problem of “jurisdiction-shipping” and border hopping, when it comes to egregious shit like this…
Sounds like it happened across three states (the three biggest ones). 3! Pretty fucked, really…
But nah, the surveillance state isn’t worried about people like him.
More people like me, who actively criticize the government, refused to comply with the jaberoo shit (mostly), and who intends to vote a firm “No” in their ideological referendum…
It’s people like me who the surveillance state is watching, lol…
Unfortunately. Despite my not having committed a crime, unlike this monster…
Men like that always get away with it. At least until they don’t.
“The victims have been contacted and have been provided counseling”, the news said. Yeah, I’m sure that will make all the difference, at this point. Not…
Simply put, the state don’t care. Sorry, but that’s the truth of it…
I'm sure they'll get some wonderful therapy too.
"therapist" to victims: "Don't you see how this is all the fault of the cis hetero normative capitalist white supremacist patriarchy?"
more like: "have you considered becoming a boy so this never happens again?"
Well... surveillance, censorship, and laws in general only target cooperative law-abiding citizens to begin with.
Pretty much but using the argument against the surveillance state with cases like this is a good strategy
Normies will occasionally go 'think of the children, that's why we need the government to have more powers to monitor' and we just throw these examples in their face of how the state didn't give a fuck, they were more focused on arresting and debanking an anti lockdown protestor than a demon raping under 10 year old girls.
It's quite simple: the surveillance state is to protect them and their cronies. they don't allocate resources to catching pedophiles because pedophiles are not a threat to the state. matter of fact, pedophiles in many cases are part of the state.