The climate hysteria movement is the most successful doomsday cult in history and very likely has already succeeded in dooming humanity to hundreds of years of darkness.
If it relies on fraudulent data, models that have never been accurate and on erasing all evidence contrary to their theory and using government funds to push narratives, propaganda and fund studies that always act with the same bias, can you really call it an "organic" movement?
The climate hysteria movement is the most successful doomsday cult in history and very likely has already succeeded in dooming humanity to hundreds of years of darkness.
How organic does a movement have to be to fit the definition of "cult"?
If it relies on fraudulent data, models that have never been accurate and on erasing all evidence contrary to their theory and using government funds to push narratives, propaganda and fund studies that always act with the same bias, can you really call it an "organic" movement?
Probably not, which is why we ask.
These people are not hoodwinked cultists, but unthinking followers of the largest propaganda campaign in human history.
"Climate Change" is a more far-reaching, more influential, more destructive hoax than even the most virulent skinheads will claim the Holocaust was.