It's obvious what he's replying to. Same as the other guy. "If he didn't want NATO to expend he shouldn't have invaded Ukraine."
Taking Cato's statement as fact, if "NATO has been expanding since 1989", it wouldn't matter what Putin did or didn't do. Perhaps Finland wouldn't have used Ukraine as casus belli, but NATO could have found another way to expand.
If NATO didn't want Putin to invade Ukraine maybe they should have stayed out of Ukraine's affairs.
You've got it. Takes two to tango.
NATO has been expanding since 1989. Your entire premise is based on a lie.
It's obvious what he's replying to. Same as the other guy. "If he didn't want NATO to expend he shouldn't have invaded Ukraine."
Taking Cato's statement as fact, if "NATO has been expanding since 1989", it wouldn't matter what Putin did or didn't do. Perhaps Finland wouldn't have used Ukraine as casus belli, but NATO could have found another way to expand.