You want wind so you do not put more CO2 in the atmosphere so you cut down trees that not only help regulate CO2 but they are also a habitat for the wildlife the same people pretend to care about.
Not sure how much energy do windmills produce but it makes me question if anyone involved in this made any calculation on the effectiveness in reducing CO2 emissions.
There are literally people out there that think we should have 0% CO2 in the atmosphere. They aren't shitposting. They really think that anything higher than literally fucking nothing is too high.
Actually, that makes a great question for the climate alarmists: how much CO2 should be in the atmosphere?
If I recall, anything less than 200ppm means you're fast-tracking your way to extinction, and at 150 you're utterly and completely fucked. The eco-terrorists wouldn't live long enough to get it to 0%.
You want wind so you do not put more CO2 in the atmosphere so you cut down trees that not only help regulate CO2 but they are also a habitat for the wildlife the same people pretend to care about.
Not sure how much energy do windmills produce but it makes me question if anyone involved in this made any calculation on the effectiveness in reducing CO2 emissions.
There are literally people out there that think we should have 0% CO2 in the atmosphere. They aren't shitposting. They really think that anything higher than literally fucking nothing is too high.
Actually, that makes a great question for the climate alarmists: how much CO2 should be in the atmosphere?
Having more CO2 in the atmosphere promotes plant growth. You're literally increasing their food supply.
0% CO2 in the atmosphere sounds like the fastest way imaginable to kill all life on the surface of the Earth.
If I recall, anything less than 200ppm means you're fast-tracking your way to extinction, and at 150 you're utterly and completely fucked. The eco-terrorists wouldn't live long enough to get it to 0%.