The case, on behalf of 13 patients and two doctors, argues that the medical exceptions to Texas' laws are unclear and unworkable for doctors in ways that harm patients. They also say that the state has done nothing to clarify its laws.
The same thing happened in Ohio, but without a lawsuit. Someone from Illinois, claimed that a doctor from Ohio, claimed that an Ohio anti-abortion trigger law was going to prevent doctors from preforming the removal of dead fetuses from a woman's uterus (dead babies if you prefer); therefore: Ohio abortion laws were killing women.
Truth is, the law never prevented such a thing, but because a doctor claimed it did over a phone call (a doctor who was an abortion activist); that was enough.
It reminds me of when DeSantis's law against grooming children came out and some outlet claimed that a furry convention would close... only for the furry convention itself to explicitly state the law had no impact on the convention.
There are people in the professional class who are intentionally misconstruing what words mean, and then refusing to preform their tasks, and then the media claims that the law stopped an unrelated procedure from happening.
Many doctors have no problem with Texas law. Maybe abortionists are profiting off the dead. The vast majority of doctors will not perform an elective abortion even if it's legal. There is some gray area. Severely deformed babies you never know if they are going to make it. I think some would declare them dead, or non-viable. Certainly not something I can argue with them about.
Clearly the anti-abortion laws haven't gone far enough (it's not a problem of "clarification") and we need to extend the law to punish doctors who refuse to perform the service. No you can't force someone to perform abortions, but you can punish them for failing to provide actual life-saving healthcare to a mother under the pretense that it's because of unclear laws. These activist doctors would have rather let the mothers die so they could make a political example out of them.
Killing the children would stop them from getting them paid in the future. The children are just going to be mutilated so they can be permanent medical patients.
The same thing happened in Ohio, but without a lawsuit. Someone from Illinois, claimed that a doctor from Ohio, claimed that an Ohio anti-abortion trigger law was going to prevent doctors from preforming the removal of dead fetuses from a woman's uterus (dead babies if you prefer); therefore: Ohio abortion laws were killing women.
Truth is, the law never prevented such a thing, but because a doctor claimed it did over a phone call (a doctor who was an abortion activist); that was enough.
It reminds me of when DeSantis's law against grooming children came out and some outlet claimed that a furry convention would close... only for the furry convention itself to explicitly state the law had no impact on the convention.
There are people in the professional class who are intentionally misconstruing what words mean, and then refusing to preform their tasks, and then the media claims that the law stopped an unrelated procedure from happening.
It’s intentional on the doctors end and there’s an entire industry funding and propagandizing so they can profit off dead children
Many doctors have no problem with Texas law. Maybe abortionists are profiting off the dead. The vast majority of doctors will not perform an elective abortion even if it's legal. There is some gray area. Severely deformed babies you never know if they are going to make it. I think some would declare them dead, or non-viable. Certainly not something I can argue with them about.
Clearly the anti-abortion laws haven't gone far enough (it's not a problem of "clarification") and we need to extend the law to punish doctors who refuse to perform the service. No you can't force someone to perform abortions, but you can punish them for failing to provide actual life-saving healthcare to a mother under the pretense that it's because of unclear laws. These activist doctors would have rather let the mothers die so they could make a political example out of them.
On the contrary.
Killing the children would stop them from getting them paid in the future. The children are just going to be mutilated so they can be permanent medical patients.