Now, if you want to fight this through an argument based around a State's power that'd probably be easier. The lists and things required to prohibit users from accessing xxx material as the UK was talking about, for a basic example off the top of my head.
A fascist state could simply define the industry and shackle it directly without trying to turn citizen rights into one-size-fits-all legislation for corporations and narratively duck-taping that to the concept of individual rights
I'm forced to defend their ability to communicate with minors because I want complete liberty in the exchange of information.
To fight against govt censorship I must support the purveyance of the obscene to the innocent??
Fuck. Everything.
Why must stopping "the purveyance of the obscene to the innocent" be considered censorship?
Another pitfall of freespeech absolutism.
Now, if you want to fight this through an argument based around a State's power that'd probably be easier. The lists and things required to prohibit users from accessing xxx material as the UK was talking about, for a basic example off the top of my head.
A fascist state could simply define the industry and shackle it directly without trying to turn citizen rights into one-size-fits-all legislation for corporations and narratively duck-taping that to the concept of individual rights