The men who leave women they knock up are the deadbeat fuckbois that women freely choose then try to baby trap into staying with them. In almost all other cases it's the woman who leaves because she wants the meal ticket without having to share the authority over the kid with the father.
I don't think Hooters is great and I don't think kids should go there, but pretending it's anything close to drag queen story hour—even in the tacit way this one does—feels like giving ground.
Also, Hooters girls are attractive 20-somethings wearing what, short shorts and a tight tank top? There’s a decent chance of seeing a bunch of women like that just walking around on a sunny day. Drag queens are on an entirely different level. Granted they usually show less skin, but they’re way more aberrant overall.
My point is that people are comparing drag queens to hooters but the drag queens are the customer and the kids are the hooter girls. Is an entire new level of evil.
What gets me is that casual Dem voters won't inform their permanently connected (TV or WWW) acquaintances that earnestly arguing this point is retarded. Or, notice and acknowledge how retarded their die-hard friends are.
The silver lining of having had a Facebook account was witnessing that a chunk of people I went to school with or met in my 20s were undependable, imitative dipshits. Wisdom and experience coming with age is bollocks, at least when it's uttered.
The men who leave women they knock up are the deadbeat fuckbois that women freely choose then try to baby trap into staying with them. In almost all other cases it's the woman who leaves because she wants the meal ticket without having to share the authority over the kid with the father.
I don't think Hooters is great and I don't think kids should go there, but pretending it's anything close to drag queen story hour—even in the tacit way this one does—feels like giving ground.
Drag queens want kids so they have a boner.
Hooter girls are there to give a boner. Granted is still not ok, but that seems like a huge difference.
Also, Hooters girls are attractive 20-somethings wearing what, short shorts and a tight tank top? There’s a decent chance of seeing a bunch of women like that just walking around on a sunny day. Drag queens are on an entirely different level. Granted they usually show less skin, but they’re way more aberrant overall.
My point is that people are comparing drag queens to hooters but the drag queens are the customer and the kids are the hooter girls. Is an entire new level of evil.
What gets me is that casual Dem voters won't inform their permanently connected (TV or WWW) acquaintances that earnestly arguing this point is retarded. Or, notice and acknowledge how retarded their die-hard friends are.
The silver lining of having had a Facebook account was witnessing that a chunk of people I went to school with or met in my 20s were undependable, imitative dipshits. Wisdom and experience coming with age is bollocks, at least when it's uttered.
It really is like this most of the time.
Yeah my mental health improved (lol) when I realized anyone who disagrees with me "are they doing the thing they accuse me of?".
It makes arguing more sane though less fun.