Demographic crisis is a major threat. We aren't having enough kids as a society & if this trend continues, we will suffer economic collapse followed by military/political collapse in favor of some other country which solves this 1st.
However, I don't want to sacrifice quality for quantity & have a society overrun with trash people. That will only result in more Democrat voters & our society will be destroyed anyway.
-
Any couples statistically likely to be able to have "good" kids who will be productive members of society, should be increasingly compelled by state incentives & coercion to have kids, including banning them from having abortions [with an exception if the kid is a mutant or retard].
-
Any couples (or single moms) statistically likely to spawn burdens to society should be encouraged to have abortions at the earliest possible time.
I agree with the single mother part. I don't agree that the children of poor people are by definition undesirable. If anything, I don't want Zuckerberg to have children, while the local janitor is pretty cool.
If red states ban abortion and are effective at it, they'll slowly become blue. I'm not sure why this is desirable. Hell, without Roe and the tens of millions of abortions, there probably wouldn't be a single red state, all other things being equal (which they wouldn't be of coures).
I used rich & poor as proxy words since I couldn't fit the whole concept into the title.
The concept is just who is statistically likely to have a productive kid vs a burden kid.
Yes that will certainly be a negative result.
We would have had a huge schism in society since crime never would have fallen from its 1980s highs. America would be some kind of police state.
It seems like that schism was just delayed. I doubt abortion was the only factor, but the reduction in crime probably played a role.