Demographic crisis is a major threat. We aren't having enough kids as a society & if this trend continues, we will suffer economic collapse followed by military/political collapse in favor of some other country which solves this 1st.
However, I don't want to sacrifice quality for quantity & have a society overrun with trash people. That will only result in more Democrat voters & our society will be destroyed anyway.
-
Any couples statistically likely to be able to have "good" kids who will be productive members of society, should be increasingly compelled by state incentives & coercion to have kids, including banning them from having abortions [with an exception if the kid is a mutant or retard].
-
Any couples (or single moms) statistically likely to spawn burdens to society should be encouraged to have abortions at the earliest possible time.
I used rich & poor as proxy words since I couldn't fit the whole concept into the title.
The concept is just who is statistically likely to have a productive kid vs a burden kid.
Yes that will certainly be a negative result.
We would have had a huge schism in society since crime never would have fallen from its 1980s highs. America would be some kind of police state.
It seems like that schism was just delayed. I doubt abortion was the only factor, but the reduction in crime probably played a role.