This politician already completed your bingo card a few months back by unsolicitedly declaring Michael Geist, the leading tech law prof in Canada, a racist for not being on board with Trudeau's previous round of online censorship legislation.
You're sharing this opinion on a platform, for free, that allows you to reach a wider audience than you otherwise would be able to. Should Twitter have to pay you for "using" your content?
Thank you for taking the time out of your day to defend big tech monopolies. I thought you advocated against them. I guess this falls into "liberals are bad so I support monopolies". Strange how Conservatives around the world including the US support this type of legislation
Facebook has literally nothing to gain from it. EVERYONE knows the news orgs are all liars, but some try to use that as they will. Even fucking Meta knows paying them will be the worst money sink ever.
My rule was that I don't take seriously any argument that includes the word 'racism'.
I'm adding 'democracy' to the list.
It would be great if Meta were against running over old ladies with horses (which is what they label 'democracy'), but unfortunately, it's not.
This politician already completed your bingo card a few months back by unsolicitedly declaring Michael Geist, the leading tech law prof in Canada, a racist for not being on board with Trudeau's previous round of online censorship legislation.
After the shit they pulled after the 2016 election no one should take their appeals to democracy seriously ever again.
Just when you think he's gone full retard, he kicked it into overdrive in a response to this tweet: https://twitter.com/awudrick/status/1672260104207454209
https://archive.is/wip/jCjeN
Hahaha!
Mastodon in bio really belongs to the list including BLM, pronouns and Ukraine flags.
Facebook has literally nothing to gain from it. EVERYONE knows the news orgs are all liars, but some try to use that as they will. Even fucking Meta knows paying them will be the worst money sink ever.