The jannies here continue to prove themselves no different to inbreddit. Apparently, posting a quote saying a group of people don't like being named as the group they're apart of (shout out to the midwit claiming it's "Intentional Falsehood") and saying that a group of people prioritizing what they're born as over where they're born is "Identity Attacks", it should be clear what's going on here. Feel free to show me all the bans being handed out for people talking about how "trannies need to face the wall" and how "all gay men were molested". Until then, feel free to keep doing it for free.
EDIT: DoM refuses to show the receipts to what I said. Make of that what you will.
Nah I'll defend Dom over other jannies. I appreciate him doing a job that most people don't want to do, and i don't usually get banned so nananana boo boo I guess.
You're lying about the removal. It wasn't about "not liking" it was that you were pushing Gobbels claim that jews were an inherent race of inferiors, who sought to destroy nations through degeneracy and subversion, and would stop at nothing in their quest to kill civilization.
If that was the case, you'd have reposted my comment wholesale.
But sure, I'll remember this the next time I see comments about how "rainbow niggers/pastel niggers/sand niggers/jungle niggers/rice niggers/potato niggers/maple niggers/vodka niggers/taco niggers are pushing an agenda of subversion to destroy society". Apparently, of all the groups on the face of the Earth, there's only one single group of people you're not allowed to claim have an in-group preference and work together to change the laws to suit them. Point out how the Chinese are using their influence to enrich themselves? Perfectly fine. Point out how anyone with dark skin will prefer people of similar flesh tone? Go for it. But there's one group you're not allowed to mention.
Fantastic, don't forget to actually report them if you want them removed.
Apparently, of all the groups on the face of the Earth, there's only one single group of people you're not allowed to claim have an in-group preference and work together to change the laws to suit them.
Talk about in-group preference: acceptable for all groups
Racial conspiracy to change national law to allow them to dominate the world: bannable for all groups
I've repeatedly said this would apply to "The Patriarchy" and "White Supremacy", but there aren't any Leftists to argue those points in order to get banned.
Point out how the Chinese are using their influence to enrich themselves? Perfectly fine.
That depends on what you are saying. Can a Chinese person do that: yes. (no sanction). Is Sinoification a long-standing policy of multiple Chinese government: yes (no action). Are the Chinese seeking, as a race, to demographically dominate the world: No (and actionable).
Point out how anyone with dark skin will prefer people of similar flesh tone?
Fantastic, don't forget to actually report them if you want them removed.
Like the site is that fucking busy.
I've repeatedly said this would apply to "The Patriarchy" and "White Supremacy", but there aren't any Leftists to argue those points in order to get banned.
You're right, instead it's about "The Homosexual Agenda" and how "The Gays" are working together so they can fuck your kids. Despite being gay myself, I don't report those comments because I know a) shutting down conversations makes me a fucking cuck, b) engaging with people in dialogue is a more effective way at change, c) I'm not a little bitch who cries about people calling me names.
Still waiting for you to post that quote, but the way.
The jannies here continue to prove themselves no different to inbreddit. Apparently, posting a quote saying a group of people don't like being named as the group they're apart of (shout out to the midwit claiming it's "Intentional Falsehood") and saying that a group of people prioritizing what they're born as over where they're born is "Identity Attacks", it should be clear what's going on here. Feel free to show me all the bans being handed out for people talking about how "trannies need to face the wall" and how "all gay men were molested". Until then, feel free to keep doing it for free.
EDIT: DoM refuses to show the receipts to what I said. Make of that what you will.
Weird how saying a group of people don't like being named is apparently a "falsehood" yet look how vitriolic the reaction is.
After reading this I still have no idea what happened here. As usual, however, the Jews are at fault
Nah I'll defend Dom over other jannies. I appreciate him doing a job that most people don't want to do, and i don't usually get banned so nananana boo boo I guess.
You're lying about the removal. It wasn't about "not liking" it was that you were pushing Gobbels claim that jews were an inherent race of inferiors, who sought to destroy nations through degeneracy and subversion, and would stop at nothing in their quest to kill civilization.
Stop lying.
If that was the case, you'd have reposted my comment wholesale.
But sure, I'll remember this the next time I see comments about how "rainbow niggers/pastel niggers/sand niggers/jungle niggers/rice niggers/potato niggers/maple niggers/vodka niggers/taco niggers are pushing an agenda of subversion to destroy society". Apparently, of all the groups on the face of the Earth, there's only one single group of people you're not allowed to claim have an in-group preference and work together to change the laws to suit them. Point out how the Chinese are using their influence to enrich themselves? Perfectly fine. Point out how anyone with dark skin will prefer people of similar flesh tone? Go for it. But there's one group you're not allowed to mention.
Fantastic, don't forget to actually report them if you want them removed.
Talk about in-group preference: acceptable for all groups
Racial conspiracy to change national law to allow them to dominate the world: bannable for all groups
I've repeatedly said this would apply to "The Patriarchy" and "White Supremacy", but there aren't any Leftists to argue those points in order to get banned.
That depends on what you are saying. Can a Chinese person do that: yes. (no sanction). Is Sinoification a long-standing policy of multiple Chinese government: yes (no action). Are the Chinese seeking, as a race, to demographically dominate the world: No (and actionable).
Literally never actionable.
Like the site is that fucking busy.
You're right, instead it's about "The Homosexual Agenda" and how "The Gays" are working together so they can fuck your kids. Despite being gay myself, I don't report those comments because I know a) shutting down conversations makes me a fucking cuck, b) engaging with people in dialogue is a more effective way at change, c) I'm not a little bitch who cries about people calling me names.
Still waiting for you to post that quote, but the way.
Transgenderism is not a legitimate identity, in fact it is no identity at all.
You know full well that's not what's being said.