Fantastic, don't forget to actually report them if you want them removed.
Apparently, of all the groups on the face of the Earth, there's only one single group of people you're not allowed to claim have an in-group preference and work together to change the laws to suit them.
Talk about in-group preference: acceptable for all groups
Racial conspiracy to change national law to allow them to dominate the world: bannable for all groups
I've repeatedly said this would apply to "The Patriarchy" and "White Supremacy", but there aren't any Leftists to argue those points in order to get banned.
Point out how the Chinese are using their influence to enrich themselves? Perfectly fine.
That depends on what you are saying. Can a Chinese person do that: yes. (no sanction). Is Sinoification a long-standing policy of multiple Chinese government: yes (no action). Are the Chinese seeking, as a race, to demographically dominate the world: No (and actionable).
Point out how anyone with dark skin will prefer people of similar flesh tone?
Fantastic, don't forget to actually report them if you want them removed.
Like the site is that fucking busy.
I've repeatedly said this would apply to "The Patriarchy" and "White Supremacy", but there aren't any Leftists to argue those points in order to get banned.
You're right, instead it's about "The Homosexual Agenda" and how "The Gays" are working together so they can fuck your kids. Despite being gay myself, I don't report those comments because I know a) shutting down conversations makes me a fucking cuck, b) engaging with people in dialogue is a more effective way at change, c) I'm not a little bitch who cries about people calling me names.
Still waiting for you to post that quote, but the way.
You're right, instead it's about "The Homosexual Agenda" and how "The Gays" are working together so they can fuck your kids.
Normally it's about queers rather than gays.
I don't report those comments
Dispirate Impact, father-fucker.
Do not fucking expect me to give you equal outcomes when you refuse to ask for those outcomes in the appropriate manner, regardless of actual number of violations.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Rule 16 is actually necessary to prevent the intentional balkanization and radicalization that Progressive Identity Politics promotes in every and all circumstances in order to deceive and recruit people into accepting pure ideological meta-narratives
Your argument has been about demanding to address Disparate Impact (Equality of Outcome) in rule enforcement regardless of the number of violations being made or being reported. That is never going to happen. I will never be able to remove enough anti-white comments in the sub compared to anti-jew comments in the sub because they'll never be in the same amount.
Fantastic, don't forget to actually report them if you want them removed.
Talk about in-group preference: acceptable for all groups
Racial conspiracy to change national law to allow them to dominate the world: bannable for all groups
I've repeatedly said this would apply to "The Patriarchy" and "White Supremacy", but there aren't any Leftists to argue those points in order to get banned.
That depends on what you are saying. Can a Chinese person do that: yes. (no sanction). Is Sinoification a long-standing policy of multiple Chinese government: yes (no action). Are the Chinese seeking, as a race, to demographically dominate the world: No (and actionable).
Literally never actionable.
Like the site is that fucking busy.
You're right, instead it's about "The Homosexual Agenda" and how "The Gays" are working together so they can fuck your kids. Despite being gay myself, I don't report those comments because I know a) shutting down conversations makes me a fucking cuck, b) engaging with people in dialogue is a more effective way at change, c) I'm not a little bitch who cries about people calling me names.
Still waiting for you to post that quote, but the way.
Normally it's about queers rather than gays.
Dispirate Impact, father-fucker.
Do not fucking expect me to give you equal outcomes when you refuse to ask for those outcomes in the appropriate manner, regardless of actual number of violations.
Since you're a mod, let me simply it for you:
The issue is not that comments aren't being removed.
The issue is that comments are being removed for wrong-think.
You keep say this like the world's gayest mantra as if it means anything to anyone without a brain parasite.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Rule 16 is actually necessary to prevent the intentional balkanization and radicalization that Progressive Identity Politics promotes in every and all circumstances in order to deceive and recruit people into accepting pure ideological meta-narratives
Your argument has been about demanding to address Disparate Impact (Equality of Outcome) in rule enforcement regardless of the number of violations being made or being reported. That is never going to happen. I will never be able to remove enough anti-white comments in the sub compared to anti-jew comments in the sub because they'll never be in the same amount.