Yes, but so what? Timcast fans are saying he wiped the floor with her, simps and trannies are saying she ebinly smacked him down, and both sides go on smugly believing they "won" yet another argument. Meanwhile, what actually transpired? An NPC delivered predictable NPC talking points straight from her masters at Actblue and Tim countered them with facts anyone with an IQ over 60 already knows. Nothing of any substance actually happened here. Nobody learned anything. Nobody's mind was changed. This is the very definition of sound and fury.
That's a good point. We should always seek to demoralize ourselves and shit all over any attempt to counter Leftist rhetorical warfare so that we can sodomize ourselves with black-pills.
Remember, we can only win the culture war by defeating ourselves, and ignoring any potential positive outcome.
Schizo take. Platforming a propagandist - even for the purpose of "debating" her - is not countering their rhetoric. There is no rhetoric. It's all phantoms who will be gone before you finish destroying them with facts and logic.
This is what almost nobody understands. THE LEFT HAVE NO BELIEFS. You can "counter" all you want, but you will achieve nothing. This woman doesn't believe a single thing she's saying. It's all noises being fed through her lizard brain by whoever's paying her. She is not capable of having beliefs. She is a soulless golem animated by avarice. By the time you get done formulating the perfect response, her "belief system" has changed entirely and now you have to start over. Her existence serves only one purpose: to waste your time arguing with someone who does not exist.
The only appropriate thing to say to a propagandist is "kill yourself". Anything beyond that and you're playing their game on their terms.
Careful. Deploying this leftist trope suggests that you actually believe in this "deplatforming" nonsense as a political tactic (denying someone an opportunity to speak publicly because of his political position). The left uses this method because their positions are morally indefensible and frequently irrational, as the Pool podcast discussion shows in no uncertain terms.
Also, debates between woke Marxists and non-revolutionaries can inform a larger section of the public about critical Marxist nonsense and the danger it poses. The more people see the way the left lies and obfuscates reality and truth, the better.
The Left is also known for their projection; they attack the "platforming" of ideologues because they platform ideologues. See CNN, New York Times, or Guardian editorials for examples.
I agree that sunlight is the best disinfectant, but for that to work, you have to let them run, not shut them down.
Yes, but so what? Timcast fans are saying he wiped the floor with her, simps and trannies are saying she ebinly smacked him down, and both sides go on smugly believing they "won" yet another argument. Meanwhile, what actually transpired? An NPC delivered predictable NPC talking points straight from her masters at Actblue and Tim countered them with facts anyone with an IQ over 60 already knows. Nothing of any substance actually happened here. Nobody learned anything. Nobody's mind was changed. This is the very definition of sound and fury.
That's a good point. We should always seek to demoralize ourselves and shit all over any attempt to counter Leftist rhetorical warfare so that we can sodomize ourselves with black-pills.
Remember, we can only win the culture war by defeating ourselves, and ignoring any potential positive outcome.
Thank you for your contribution.
Schizo take. Platforming a propagandist - even for the purpose of "debating" her - is not countering their rhetoric. There is no rhetoric. It's all phantoms who will be gone before you finish destroying them with facts and logic.
This is what almost nobody understands. THE LEFT HAVE NO BELIEFS. You can "counter" all you want, but you will achieve nothing. This woman doesn't believe a single thing she's saying. It's all noises being fed through her lizard brain by whoever's paying her. She is not capable of having beliefs. She is a soulless golem animated by avarice. By the time you get done formulating the perfect response, her "belief system" has changed entirely and now you have to start over. Her existence serves only one purpose: to waste your time arguing with someone who does not exist.
The only appropriate thing to say to a propagandist is "kill yourself". Anything beyond that and you're playing their game on their terms.
Careful. Deploying this leftist trope suggests that you actually believe in this "deplatforming" nonsense as a political tactic (denying someone an opportunity to speak publicly because of his political position). The left uses this method because their positions are morally indefensible and frequently irrational, as the Pool podcast discussion shows in no uncertain terms.
Also, debates between woke Marxists and non-revolutionaries can inform a larger section of the public about critical Marxist nonsense and the danger it poses. The more people see the way the left lies and obfuscates reality and truth, the better.
The Left is also known for their projection; they attack the "platforming" of ideologues because they platform ideologues. See CNN, New York Times, or Guardian editorials for examples.
I agree that sunlight is the best disinfectant, but for that to work, you have to let them run, not shut them down.
Platforming is a real thing. Deplatforming is not. It's like how you can say words but you can't un-say them.