This entire show van be summed up with her inability to comprehend hypotheticals, or abstract thought. That and a low iQ. Also why women should be in politics or lead anything anywhere.
Don't act like this is an ignorant woman, when it is clearly a malicious Leftist. There's no such thing as a person who can't understand a hypothetical, it's a person who's refusing to understand.
There's no such thing as a person who can't understand a hypothetical
Tell me you have never worked closely with the black community without telling me that you have never worked closely with the black community. There are hard floors in IQ below which certain mental functions cannot be performed.
While I'm sure you and your mother would fall into that category of total mental retardation; you're effectively denying something lower than even Theory of Mind.
I know you're ignorant and racist enough to want to say that black people are not more intelligent than dogs, but that is physically not the case.
There is a major difference between short-term time preference, and the inability to conceive of a hypothetical.
There are absolutely people who are incapable of considering and arguing a position that they do not agree with, and similarly there are people who are incapable of considering a hypothetical. Both black and white, though probably disproportionately black.
You seriously don't believe some people don't have the ability to think in the abstract? Are you serious or just saying she does but is malicious? I agree she's communist scum who gladly throws children to wolves if it meant her ideas win, and I find her and the ideas that have her repulsive and evil. But she's also a retard.
You seriously don't believe some people don't have the ability to think in the abstract?
I'm sure that some people can't abstract.
However, what that means is that those people are so mentally crippled that they do not have Theory of Mind. Theory of Mind is what happens naturally to 5 year olds. It means that they are so mentally crippled that they have 100% disability and a legal guardian.
It works like this:
Jack and Jane are having a picnic. They have picnic basket and a loaf of bread between them. Jack puts the loaf of bread in the basket. Jane leaves for a moment. While she's gone, Jack takes the bread and puts it behind a tree. Jane comes back.
Where does Jane think the bread is?
3 year olds do not have "Theory of Mind" and are therefore not able to abstract the concept of another person's perception; and will almost always say: "Jane thinks it's behind the tree."
5 year olds have developed Theory of Mind, and are capable of abstraction. They then proceed to gasp, and typically realize that they have 'hidden knowledge' about the location of the bread, because Jane thinks the bread is still in the basket, but it's actually behind the tree.
"Jane thinks it's behind the tree" is what happens when people can't abstract. Developing Theory of Mind late is a sign of significant Autism, and it means the child isn't going to develop properly. Never developing it makes the person a cripple. Someone with the intellectual capacity of a 3 year old can't function in society, let alone host a podcast, or drive a car out to the Timcast bunker.
This would be like asking, "what if Jack put it in the car?" and the response is, "but Jack put it behind the tree." Which is what you would get if someone could not understand a hypothetical.
Theory of mind and arguing a hypothetical are not the same thing.
This entire show van be summed up with her inability to comprehend hypotheticals, or abstract thought. That and a low iQ. Also why women should be in politics or lead anything anywhere.
Don't act like this is an ignorant woman, when it is clearly a malicious Leftist. There's no such thing as a person who can't understand a hypothetical, it's a person who's refusing to understand.
Tell me you have never worked closely with the black community without telling me that you have never worked closely with the black community. There are hard floors in IQ below which certain mental functions cannot be performed.
Quiet faggot, the adults are talking.
While I'm sure you and your mother would fall into that category of total mental retardation; you're effectively denying something lower than even Theory of Mind.
I know you're ignorant and racist enough to want to say that black people are not more intelligent than dogs, but that is physically not the case.
There is a major difference between short-term time preference, and the inability to conceive of a hypothetical.
Yep, about 20 points.
IQ puts me in the top 1%, and unlike you, my parents weren't cousins in an arranged marriage.
You can deny reality for whatever reason you want to, but those of us who have to work and live in your little melting pot utopia get to see reality.
You really are just insufferable, Giz. Please get over yourself.
Ok, that was uncalled for, and you're wrong here.
There are absolutely people who are incapable of considering and arguing a position that they do not agree with, and similarly there are people who are incapable of considering a hypothetical. Both black and white, though probably disproportionately black.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This... is doing the opposite of that.
You seriously don't believe some people don't have the ability to think in the abstract? Are you serious or just saying she does but is malicious? I agree she's communist scum who gladly throws children to wolves if it meant her ideas win, and I find her and the ideas that have her repulsive and evil. But she's also a retard.
Yes, yes he is actually saying that.
I'm sure that some people can't abstract.
However, what that means is that those people are so mentally crippled that they do not have Theory of Mind. Theory of Mind is what happens naturally to 5 year olds. It means that they are so mentally crippled that they have 100% disability and a legal guardian.
It works like this:
Jack and Jane are having a picnic. They have picnic basket and a loaf of bread between them. Jack puts the loaf of bread in the basket. Jane leaves for a moment. While she's gone, Jack takes the bread and puts it behind a tree. Jane comes back.
Where does Jane think the bread is?
3 year olds do not have "Theory of Mind" and are therefore not able to abstract the concept of another person's perception; and will almost always say: "Jane thinks it's behind the tree."
5 year olds have developed Theory of Mind, and are capable of abstraction. They then proceed to gasp, and typically realize that they have 'hidden knowledge' about the location of the bread, because Jane thinks the bread is still in the basket, but it's actually behind the tree.
"Jane thinks it's behind the tree" is what happens when people can't abstract. Developing Theory of Mind late is a sign of significant Autism, and it means the child isn't going to develop properly. Never developing it makes the person a cripple. Someone with the intellectual capacity of a 3 year old can't function in society, let alone host a podcast, or drive a car out to the Timcast bunker.
Your example is not a hypothetical.
This would be like asking, "what if Jack put it in the car?" and the response is, "but Jack put it behind the tree." Which is what you would get if someone could not understand a hypothetical.
Theory of mind and arguing a hypothetical are not the same thing.