An Indictment of the Indictment - Razör Rants
(odysee.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Please go look at what Jonathan Turley, Andrew McCarthy and Judge Napolitano have to say on this case.
This is Andrew McCarthy's take: https://archive.is/agqao
This is Jonathan Turley's take: https://archive.is/fOZ4u
This is Judge Napolitano's take: https://archive.is/eaSU5
Don't take this the wrong way but why on Earth would you listen to any of those people?
The Grand Jury who submitted this indictment were PURPOSEFULLY NOT INFORMED ABOUT PREVIOUS PRECEDENT.
You need to understand what that means and then you'll completely understand what is happening.
Jonathan Turley: Says Alvin Bragg's case against President Donald Trump is "legally pathetic."
Andrew McCarthy: Defends three-letter agencies. Swamp.
Judge Andrew Napolitano: Fired by Fox News for being based, learned his place, cringe since. Betrayed Donald Trump numerous times.
Why do you take the easy road?
"You don't have to work hard to be negative. You don't have to work hard to be a pessimist. You don't have to reach a certain level of consciousness in order to be negative. We all can easily do it. Being optimistic and positive is what takes work."
Rush Limbaugh
You are talking about things that are irrelevant to the legal issues at the heart of the federal documents case. That is not the same as Bragg case.
Just look at the articles.
This is Andrew McCarthy's take: https://archive.is/agqao
This is Jonathan Turley's take: https://archive.is/fOZ4u
This is Judge Napolitano's take: https://archive.is/eaSU5
"Surely, if I spam the same links ad nauseam, others will automatically just take my word for it!"
~onetruephilosoraptor, maybe
I was not expecting anyone to take my word for it.
I expected people here to be open to read some different viewpoints but I guess I was wrong and this is now an echo-chamber where people discount and ignore anything that is not what they want to hear.