I haven't been following, but did he publicly take a stance against "What is a woman"? Don't find it hard to believe there are still jannies at Twitter censoring things they don't like.
No, he didn't. In fact, he's doing everything he can to make sure it gets shown as planned without overstepping his own authority and pissing off the revenue sources.
He originally tweeted out about that Twitter would be employing a "free speech, not reach" strategy with Matt Walsh's video and posts last night. Giving the justification that people had the right not to be exposed to "sensitive" content.
Meaning The Daily Wire's tweets regarding the event wouldn't be shown to anyone who didn't already follow The Daily Wire.
So effectively shadowbanning.
And they didn't even deliver on that, as comments, RTs etc remained banned during the movie's anniversary stream to even followers who sought it out.
I haven't been following, but did he publicly take a stance against "What is a woman"? Don't find it hard to believe there are still jannies at Twitter censoring things they don't like.
No, he didn't. In fact, he's doing everything he can to make sure it gets shown as planned without overstepping his own authority and pissing off the revenue sources.
Figured. Thanks for the confirmation though.
He originally tweeted out about that Twitter would be employing a "free speech, not reach" strategy with Matt Walsh's video and posts last night. Giving the justification that people had the right not to be exposed to "sensitive" content.
Meaning The Daily Wire's tweets regarding the event wouldn't be shown to anyone who didn't already follow The Daily Wire.
So effectively shadowbanning.
And they didn't even deliver on that, as comments, RTs etc remained banned during the movie's anniversary stream to even followers who sought it out.
But then he went back on that recently and now it's got 48 million views so...
I'm glad he changed his mind and it had a Streisand effect.
But Elon's original take was still fake and gay.