Easy solution? Work to reduce the influence of both groups and it doesn't matter who is more correct, things will improve.
If imp and the stormies could agree that dismantling the power base of millionaire jewish women C-suites fits within both their agendas, I figure that'd be more productive than constantly bitching at each other and there's enough of those alone to keep both sides busy for the next few years.
Focus on the tasks you have in common and pool your efforts.
This would work, except for the fact that Imp is fucking psychotic and won't compromise on anything or even deign to work against women holding positions of power. He just wants to detonate the entire human race and then gets confused about why everyone hates him. Then he rationalizes it to himself as getting botted.
I am working against women holding positions of power. I've been voting against female board members at every shareholder meeting I have the level of assets required to attend, but nobody's getting ousted. I don't have the numbers, I don't have the wealth to force it through.
For now, we're winning against the resolutions for gender "equity" audits, mainly because the board (and all the autopilot proxy votes) are against it, but I'm seeing more and more of that attempted. If one passes, the dam breaks.
Instead of caring about the shiny keys women and the WEF are waving in front of your faces with Mulvaney and the "women's sports" brigade maybe we should focus on the real problems. Instead of going on about Blackrock being "muh Jewish agenda", we should be focusing on the legal reasons why they should have no votes on shares held for somebody else. Can you imagine how absurd it would be in any other format? Imagine if your landlord could cast your vote in the elections for you! That's how you frame this shit to a fucking normal person. You don't go on about Jewish conspiracies and make the mere mention of the name induce eyerolls to everyone who doesn't have an Adolf Hitler painting in their living room.
Added to that, for those who do get a vote on the proposals, if you don't vote, the system votes for you, on the board's recommendations. That means yes to everyone on the board currently. That's how these people remain. Fix those two issues and you fix the system - nobody would dare rig a shareholder vote.
Why should I compromise with people who literally want to destroy my life and laugh about it? Why should I compromise with people who are shown clear paths to victory and ignore them? Neither women themselves nor their allies have any value as allies to anything good. We've seen that with how the right has gotten since they became a larger part of it.
Where was the push to take back the WI Supreme Court by leveraging the woman's DV conviction against her? No, instead we get women's shill crap. I'm sure that's just a coincidence and there aren't people making sure the right doesn't deviate from a pro-woman paths. The same day we lost Wisconsin for good, everyone was told to go after Bud Light. That'll help us reach 270! No, don't try to remove activist feminist judges who will entrench voter fraud, get mad at piss beer.
Everything you say, undermines your credibility and agency. Your framing is so extreme, that your actions are incongruent with your words.
There are logical conclusions to your thinking, all of which are quite grimdark and quite violent, but they are conclusions.
But you don't go there. So I'm left with only one of two conclusions:
A. You don't actually believe the things you say, you're just a troll trying to provoke others into reaching the mental conclusions you want them to, for your own amusement, or...
B. You know where your thinking leads, but you're just a coward.
Easy solution? Work to reduce the influence of both groups and it doesn't matter who is more correct, things will improve.
If imp and the stormies could agree that dismantling the power base of millionaire jewish women C-suites fits within both their agendas, I figure that'd be more productive than constantly bitching at each other and there's enough of those alone to keep both sides busy for the next few years.
Focus on the tasks you have in common and pool your efforts.
This would work, except for the fact that Imp is fucking psychotic and won't compromise on anything or even deign to work against women holding positions of power. He just wants to detonate the entire human race and then gets confused about why everyone hates him. Then he rationalizes it to himself as getting botted.
I am working against women holding positions of power. I've been voting against female board members at every shareholder meeting I have the level of assets required to attend, but nobody's getting ousted. I don't have the numbers, I don't have the wealth to force it through.
For now, we're winning against the resolutions for gender "equity" audits, mainly because the board (and all the autopilot proxy votes) are against it, but I'm seeing more and more of that attempted. If one passes, the dam breaks.
Instead of caring about the shiny keys women and the WEF are waving in front of your faces with Mulvaney and the "women's sports" brigade maybe we should focus on the real problems. Instead of going on about Blackrock being "muh Jewish agenda", we should be focusing on the legal reasons why they should have no votes on shares held for somebody else. Can you imagine how absurd it would be in any other format? Imagine if your landlord could cast your vote in the elections for you! That's how you frame this shit to a fucking normal person. You don't go on about Jewish conspiracies and make the mere mention of the name induce eyerolls to everyone who doesn't have an Adolf Hitler painting in their living room.
Added to that, for those who do get a vote on the proposals, if you don't vote, the system votes for you, on the board's recommendations. That means yes to everyone on the board currently. That's how these people remain. Fix those two issues and you fix the system - nobody would dare rig a shareholder vote.
Why should I compromise with people who literally want to destroy my life and laugh about it? Why should I compromise with people who are shown clear paths to victory and ignore them? Neither women themselves nor their allies have any value as allies to anything good. We've seen that with how the right has gotten since they became a larger part of it.
Where was the push to take back the WI Supreme Court by leveraging the woman's DV conviction against her? No, instead we get women's shill crap. I'm sure that's just a coincidence and there aren't people making sure the right doesn't deviate from a pro-woman paths. The same day we lost Wisconsin for good, everyone was told to go after Bud Light. That'll help us reach 270! No, don't try to remove activist feminist judges who will entrench voter fraud, get mad at piss beer.
Here's the thing TI...
Everything you say, undermines your credibility and agency. Your framing is so extreme, that your actions are incongruent with your words.
There are logical conclusions to your thinking, all of which are quite grimdark and quite violent, but they are conclusions.
But you don't go there. So I'm left with only one of two conclusions:
A. You don't actually believe the things you say, you're just a troll trying to provoke others into reaching the mental conclusions you want them to, for your own amusement, or...
B. You know where your thinking leads, but you're just a coward.
I don't want to be as bad as my enemy.