There's a lot of good parts, but I think we can take a good examination of his discussion tactics in dealing with a Faux Conservative who is defending the Neo-Liberal Feminist Wage-Slavery for mothers. The best part of this conversation is that this wasn't supposed to be a talk about family, but she opened herself up to the conversation
Confront The Leftist. Reject The Narrative. Assert the Affirmative Vision.
Confront. Reject. Assert.
He Confronts her tone-policing mask of conservatism, and her position as controlled opposition.
He Rejects her narratives pre-meditatively. Then rejects her moral framework openly.
He Asserts our own moral framework unapologetically. Assert the benefits therein.
That first entanglement in the title is good, but this one is actually better:
"And you'll expect your partner, if she's a woman, to stay at home and look after the children?"
"The partner I pick would want to stay at home with the children."
You can see from her sly smile after this exchange was her thinking she scored some sort of a hit against him, but Connor was quick enough to notice that although the first answer was "Yes", the second answer was different, because it was a trap.
She wanted to go with the insinuation that he would tie her to the kitchen floor, but he came out with the point that this would be a voluntary agreement as part of a marriage, which also insinuated that he has a relationship selection advantage. The man offers the relationship to a woman who is prepared for his relationship standards, as the woman would offer sex to a man who is prepared to meet her sex standards.
Unable to counter any of that, she simply ignores it and inserts her own interpretation. Thankfully, because this is GB News, the host can actually challenge her on her attack.
Saw this on today's episode of the LotusEater's Podcast on how well the National Conservative Convention is going.
There's a lot of good parts...
Yeah, I listened to that episode yesterday at work, it was a really good one, with lots of important points. Such as, yes, conservatives should be conservative. It's sad it needs to be said, but it does, and I'm glad more people are saying it.
It amazes me how extremely left the overton window has been pushed that basic values of conservatism is considered outdated and evil, doesn't help that the old bitch argues like an disingenuous asshole trying to discredit the man's character rather than challenge his points. This is why women in politics is cancer because she took every point he gave as some sort of a personal attack. Good on him for smacking her arguments and good on the host actually moderating and calling out the hags bullshit when she asked the old crone what is right wing to her then.
Also I love his "i dont give a shit" to her "its current year!" meme
This is not the result of "women in politics", this is the standard talking point of every Leftist, which you will normally find Leftist men doing as well. Additionally, what they are also arguing about is a right-wing, populist, anti-Liberal, female, parliamentarian's statement on women's role in society.
Saw this on today's episode of the LotusEater's Podcast on how well the National Conservative Convention is going.
There's a lot of good parts, but I think we can take a good examination of his discussion tactics in dealing with a Faux Conservative who is defending the Neo-Liberal Feminist Wage-Slavery for mothers. The best part of this conversation is that this wasn't supposed to be a talk about family, but she opened herself up to the conversation
Confront The Leftist. Reject The Narrative. Assert the Affirmative Vision.
Confront. Reject. Assert.
That first entanglement in the title is good, but this one is actually better:
You can see from her sly smile after this exchange was her thinking she scored some sort of a hit against him, but Connor was quick enough to notice that although the first answer was "Yes", the second answer was different, because it was a trap.
She wanted to go with the insinuation that he would tie her to the kitchen floor, but he came out with the point that this would be a voluntary agreement as part of a marriage, which also insinuated that he has a relationship selection advantage. The man offers the relationship to a woman who is prepared for his relationship standards, as the woman would offer sex to a man who is prepared to meet her sex standards.
Unable to counter any of that, she simply ignores it and inserts her own interpretation. Thankfully, because this is GB News, the host can actually challenge her on her attack.
I would also add "Persistently stay on course." This gives you the "CRAP all over them" strategy.
"Persist." may be enough as it is.
CRAP.
I Like it!
Well done, Arch.
Interesting branding, can call their usual strategy SHITSTORM too.
Scream Hysterically, Insult Them, Slander Them, Order Removal, Mob
This is exactly what they did to Vic Mignogna.
Yeah, I listened to that episode yesterday at work, it was a really good one, with lots of important points. Such as, yes, conservatives should be conservative. It's sad it needs to be said, but it does, and I'm glad more people are saying it.
"Women do not have penises"
rapturous applause
Unfortunately, it is the nature of our problem: the Left sets the tempo of battle until we can push an affirmative vision to counter them with.
It amazes me how extremely left the overton window has been pushed that basic values of conservatism is considered outdated and evil, doesn't help that the old bitch argues like an disingenuous asshole trying to discredit the man's character rather than challenge his points. This is why women in politics is cancer because she took every point he gave as some sort of a personal attack. Good on him for smacking her arguments and good on the host actually moderating and calling out the hags bullshit when she asked the old crone what is right wing to her then.
Also I love his "i dont give a shit" to her "its current year!" meme
This is not the result of "women in politics", this is the standard talking point of every Leftist, which you will normally find Leftist men doing as well. Additionally, what they are also arguing about is a right-wing, populist, anti-Liberal, female, parliamentarian's statement on women's role in society.