Notice how they complain when the object is more attractive then them. It’s not about agency, as by that same argument the grumpy ugly woman character meant to deny “male gaze” is equally being objectified by women in their spite. It’s a hilariously stupid argument that essentially boils down to anything female must be designed by females and forced to be ugly because men bad. Feminists truly are the worst as everything ultimately comes down to their obsession with hating men.
The feminist perspective is that the battle of the sexes is a zero-sum game; oppress or be oppressed. Summed up as:
For women to win, men must lose.
Therefore the feminist will conclude:
Anything that increases male agency (for instance: access to attractive fictional women) decreases female agency and (as such) must be opposed.
Q.E.D.
I fleshed out argument here. Basically, they're dressing up the art as a person who needs to be 'respected' because of competition against women's presumed monopoly on hetrosexual men's attention. The feminist is trying to 'protect' the fictional woman's 'agency' to keep her from competing with the Sisterhood. If the woman in question weren't fictional, then a back-biting catfight would start.
Why don't you ask her why she's being jealous about fictional women?
Notice how they complain when the object is more attractive then them. It’s not about agency, as by that same argument the grumpy ugly woman character meant to deny “male gaze” is equally being objectified by women in their spite. It’s a hilariously stupid argument that essentially boils down to anything female must be designed by females and forced to be ugly because men bad. Feminists truly are the worst as everything ultimately comes down to their obsession with hating men.
Two feminist axioms:
Per feminism (and hypergamy):
The feminist perspective is that the battle of the sexes is a zero-sum game; oppress or be oppressed. Summed up as:
Therefore the feminist will conclude:
Anything that increases male agency (for instance: access to attractive fictional women) decreases female agency and (as such) must be opposed.
Q.E.D.
I fleshed out argument here. Basically, they're dressing up the art as a person who needs to be 'respected' because of competition against women's presumed monopoly on hetrosexual men's attention. The feminist is trying to 'protect' the fictional woman's 'agency' to keep her from competing with the Sisterhood. If the woman in question weren't fictional, then a back-biting catfight would start.
Why don't you ask her why she's being jealous about fictional women?